Democrats and World War IV

American Thinker ^ | February 06, 2007 | Ted Belman

[reagan_fanatic]

While it is right and prudent to fear our islamist enemies in Iraq and elsewhere, we face a domestic enemy even more dangerous, as this enemy can influence public opinion through the power of a sympathetic mass media and also has within its power the ability to alter the conduct of this war or put a stop to it altogether.

This is a two-front war, not one.

[Campion]

That statement was a BIG gamble - and not a bright one.

Hillary, like her husband, lies for reasons of political expediency at the drop of a hat.

Didn't she at one time promise not to run for president?

Like everything else she promises, she'll keep this promise if it's the politically expedient thing for her to do.

[OldPossum]

The West is enervated and frivolous right now, but it retains, deep down, a bred-in-the-bone capacity for overwhelming violence.

That statement, for some reason reminded me of something I read one time. It went along these lines: "There is nothing more dangerous and ferocious as a pissed-off American GI."