"Peace Through Weakness" will rally the democrats to victory.
1 posted on
02/09/2007 6:04:39 AM PST by
Schnucki
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Schnucki
2 posted on
02/09/2007 6:06:21 AM PST by
WorkerbeeCitizen
(Religion of peace my arse - We need a maintenance Crusade - piss on Islam)
To: Schnucki
I suggest we consider emptying our nuclear arsenal over ... say ... Natanz.
3 posted on
02/09/2007 6:08:30 AM PST by
sono
(There are only two exit strategies - One is victory, the other defeat - Joe Lieberman)
To: Schnucki
Excellent Idea!
Does he have anything better to replace them with?
By the same logic, the nation should dispense with its armed forces and set a good example. We should never support war. "As global leaders, we will be the first to disband our army"
Who is this lunartic on the fringe?
To: Schnucki
This is the difference between Rats and Republicans, Reagan actually did cut the number of nuclear weapons, but he did it on the condition that the Russians would reduce theirs.
Democrats believe in unilaterally disarming.
5 posted on
02/09/2007 6:10:42 AM PST by
dfwgator
(The University of Florida - Championship U)
To: Schnucki
He also called for the United States to join the 1997 Kyoto Protocol on curbing such emissions "and then go well beyond it."
At this point, I realized our nuclear arsenal was safe.
6 posted on
02/09/2007 6:12:53 AM PST by
Thrownatbirth
(.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.re)
To: Schnucki
Does Richardson live in a sterile vacuum with no outside contact or is he just plain ignorant?
Actually, no answer required. Pre-911, here we come.
To: Schnucki
More like Peace Through Surrender.
8 posted on
02/09/2007 6:14:00 AM PST by
LIConFem
To: Schnucki
i agree, we really need to reduce the number of nukes in our arsenal.
what are the coordinates to iran?
10 posted on
02/09/2007 6:16:13 AM PST by
absolootezer0
(stop repeat offenders - don't re-elect them!)
To: Schnucki
He learns a lot on all those junkets to NKorea...
11 posted on
02/09/2007 6:22:15 AM PST by
johnny7
("We took a hell of a beating." -'Vinegar Joe' Stilwell)
To: Schnucki
Rather than closing Guantanamo Bay Richardson should be fighting for lives of two American Border Guards, one who was beaten up by illegal thugs incarcerated there - Gitmo is a paradise compared to this h--- hole. Richardson is interested only in his ability to grab headlines on things that he can do nothing about. HE and others can do something about Border Patrol Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean.
12 posted on
02/09/2007 6:22:31 AM PST by
yoe
("Take No Prisoners" has a lovely ring to it...............)
To: Schnucki
Dump our nukes, use less gas, live in caves. That's the Richardson platform...
To: Schnucki
and dramatically cutting energy use
This is the whole point behind the Global Warming crowd.
17 posted on
02/09/2007 6:41:28 AM PST by
Pox
(If it's a Coward you are searching for, you need look no further than the Democrats.)
To: Schnucki
Easily done for Bill Richardson. He can just give them to China like all the other national security stuff he already gave them.
20 posted on
02/09/2007 6:44:53 AM PST by
rod1
To: Schnucki
Democratic presidential candidate Bill Richardson said Thursday the United States must lead the way on global struggles by reducing its nuclear weapons, closing the Guantanamo Bay detention facility and dramatically cutting energy use. The LAST thing Americans want to hear in todays dangerous world is that we are going to downsize our defenses in ANY capacity! It is, however; amusing to see my governor shoot himself in the foot this early in the game.
24 posted on
02/09/2007 6:50:39 AM PST by
NRA2BFree
(DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRESIDENT IN 2008! HE IS AN HONEST CONSERVATIVE!!)
To: Schnucki
I believe Richardson will be Hillary's choice for veep on her potential ticket.
Since she started pawning herself off as a "moderate", she will attempt to win back the affections of her radical left base by selecting that uberloon Richardson as her running mate.
He carries just enough foreign and domestic credentials to fool the the sheeple into thinking he's qualified for the second highest office in the land.
In truth, he and the Hildebeast are both pinko soulmates.
I also feel he's a weak man and will be malleable mass of flesh (like Sandy Burglar) under the direct control of his former master, Bill Klinton.
Leni
27 posted on
02/09/2007 6:57:16 AM PST by
MinuteGal
(The Left takes power only through deception.)
To: Schnucki
Oh yeah. this will get him elected. idiot.
28 posted on
02/09/2007 6:58:06 AM PST by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
To: CedarDave; LegendHasIt; Rogle; leapfrog0202; Santa Fe_Conservative; DesertDreamer; ...
29 posted on
02/09/2007 6:58:41 AM PST by
greyfoxx39
(Just remember, fully HALF of the people you encounter in life are below average.)
To: Schnucki
Great--he's the governor of a state in which a great deal of money is made from oil/gas drilling and energy production. (Farmington, anyone?)
Dude is cutting his own throat. Oh, and way to just up and abandon nukes like your buddy Billy Jeff tried to do by allowing the ChiComs to walk out of Los Alamos with all our damned secrets!
31 posted on
02/09/2007 6:59:16 AM PST by
OCCASparky
(Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
To: Schnucki
What an idiot.The russians and chinese will never disarm,nor will Iran once it gets nukes. If these people ever control the white house we will get bullied by other nuclear powers. Utter moron.
To: Schnucki
Ya!
And give them to AQ to show good faith.....
What an idiot!
34 posted on
02/09/2007 11:00:05 AM PST by
G Larry
(Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson