[dirtboy]

There is no question that Giuliani's position on abortion and gun control will offend many Republicans. But let's be clear, he is no liberal.

Yeah, sure. Pro-choice to the point of getting awards and campaign contributions from NARAL. Pro-gun-control to the point of revoking permits from long-term holders. Pro-gay-rights. Pro-amnesty to the point of defying federal court rulings to stop NYC's sanctuary city policy.

In favor of CFR. Out of sixty judicial appointments while mayor, two were pubbies. Endorsed Cuomo over Pataki in 1994.

Nah, he's not a liberal.

I'm really getting sick of spinnners thinking we are dumb enough to join them at the Koolaid trough.

[madprof98]

I'm really getting sick of spinnners thinking we are dumb enough to join them at the Koolaid trough.

Sure is easy to manipulate people. We hear a couple of pundits shilling for this leftist, and within minutes we have a bandwagonful of FReepers willing to shed blood for him. Unreal.

[ken5050]

No one is asking to drink the Koolaid, my friend. Those of us here who support Rudy do so for two reasons. He's right on national security, the War on Terror, and that is the ONE overriding issue in 2008. And he can win the election. All we're asking of you is that you listen to Rudy, with an open mind, as he tries to win your vote..No more, no less. Is that too much to request?

[Fierce Allegiance]

I'm really getting sick of spinnners thinking we are dumb enough to join them at the Koolaid trough.

The sad thing is most people ARE that stupid, or just dont' care enough about America, and will vote for this disaster.

[Jim Noble]

Out of sixty judicial appointments while mayor, two were pubbies

Two out of how many qualified and politically acceptable Republican NYC lawyers?

[Nonstatist]

I'm really getting sick of spinnners

He's more conservative than Bush, who at the end of the day will be seen as a total disaster, especially if Hillary is elected.

Only the TRULY STUPID PARTY would twice vote for a Bush!..And why? I'll tell you why... Because he was "pro-life" ! (And his tax cut will be sunsetted, by the way, so leave that out) Pretty shallow, dont you think?

[NYC Republican]

Dirt- honest question for you, and this coming from someone who, in a perfect world, I'd support whole-heartedly... If the Hillary machine will generate over $200 million for her campaign, foregoing fed funds, how can Hunter possibly compete? Hill already has tons of free media via the MSM press, on top of the $200.

I'd bet that even if Hunter can raise $100 million, most of that will go to just neutralizing the bad press that he'll get (radical right, etc etc etc)... Then he's at break-even vs. Hillary's money machine...

I'm not decided yet, but if Hunter or Newt can't compete, Rudy has the resources to do so... I might have to support Rudy if it comes to that. I'm not prepared to go that route yet, but towards the end of the year, if Hunter's name recognition among the masses isn't more well-known, and hasn't been "Borked" or "Newted" by the media by then, he might have a shot...

Else, stop Hillary/Obama at all costs.