[Doninnj]

Sounds like a good time for a third party candidate.

"Yeah, let's put the Dems in charge of foreign policy instead of someone who is 100% on board with the continued prosecution of the war on terror. Good plan."



Anyone "conservative" or Republican who would even entertain the thought of a third party candidate is endorsing Hillary and no better than the left wing scum they profess to disdain.

A REAL conservative wouldn't think of it.

[upsdriver]

It sure is nice of you to decide for all real conservatives.

[tobyhill]

The Republican base Conservatives are lost with Rudy anyway so what difference is a third party candidate? How about the Republican party just put a real base candidate out there and we won't have to argue so many Rudy liberal ideas fitting in the party?

[Post-Neolithic]

"A REAL conservative wouldn't think of it."

A real conservative wouldn't even think about nominating Rudy.

[Post-Neolithic]

"A REAL conservative wouldn't think of it."

A real conservative wouldn't even think about nominating Rudy.

[ellery]

I like Rudy and am likely to vote for him if he can convince me that he'll repudiate his gun-grabbing ways, but this "the other side is worse/Anybody But Hillary" argument seems less than motivating. It didn't work for the Anybody But Bush/vote Kerry crowd, and it won't work for us.

We need to give people a positive reason to vote for someone, instead of just insulting people.