Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomNeocon
Newt would be interesting at the very least improve the debate IMO

Newt needs to be in Congress. He proved he couldn't handle Clinton in the '95 government-shutdown coup. He proved he couldn't handle the Speaker's job, which also shackled him as an advocate of conservativism.

He needs to be in Congressional leadership, preferably the House -- he needs to be Majority Leader in the House or Senate, House better than Senate because of the clubbiness of the latter which would cramp Newt's style.

Newt's a cheerleader, and we need a cheerleader in a cheerleader's job. We also need him as a conservative sitting in the decisionmaking circles of Congress. He could do a good job in the Bully Pulpit, but the MSM will never let him get there -- they singled him out for destruction immediately after the 1994 elections and went to work on him (I saved that "Man of the Year" hate-photo TIME put on their cover), and they basically hung a frame around him. He'd never get to the White House.

117 posted on 02/11/2007 7:11:55 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: lentulusgracchus
He [Newt] proved he couldn't handle the Speaker's job, which also shackled him as an advocate of conservativism.

He needs to be in Congressional leadership


Either you mistyped something or ....

You say Newt could not handle the Speaker's job, but you say he needs to be in Congressional leadership?

If he couldn't handle it before, why do you think he could handle it now? He resigned from the Speakership and basically walked out on his House seat.
137 posted on 02/11/2007 7:29:43 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson