Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rove: 2008 Race Is Already Too Much, Too Soon
The Politico/Drudge ^ | 2/12/07 | Mike Allen and John Harris

Posted on 02/12/2007 8:42:01 PM PST by woofie

White House senior adviser Karl Rove says that the 2008 presidential candidates have been pushed into such an early focus on tactics, fundraising and publicity that they risk a backlash from voters long before the first primary ballots are cast.

"I think it is going to mean that people develop a persona earlier and wear out their welcome earlier than they would," he told The Politico in an interview. "I think there's going to come some point this year where people are going to basically be saying: 'I'm largely disinterested in the contest.' ''

But Rove doubts that will slow the campaign. "There's going to be so much momentum from everybody feeling like they need to continue to move around the country and do things and to engage each other," he said.

In the wide-ranging half-hour interview in his West Wing office late last week, Rove also remarked on a shift in relations between the administration and Congress since the Democrats gained power.

"The entire White House is spending a lot more time talking to the Hill and a lot more time seeking feedback and giving them the time that they want," Rove said. He said his own outreach efforts include following up on "a letter to me from a Democrat member" who asked him "to look into a specific issue" that he did not reveal.

"Why this member feels comfortable saying, 'Here's something that I want you to look into,' I can't speak to," Rove said. "But I'm glad that she feels that she can say: 'I'd like you to look into this. I think we can find a way to work together.' "

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: electionpresident; rove; rymb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: upsdriver

You don't expect me to back up anything I say here with facts, do you?

I read it somewhere.


21 posted on 02/12/2007 9:06:32 PM PST by streetpreacher (What if you're wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher

Okay, I had no idea, so I was curious.


22 posted on 02/12/2007 9:07:16 PM PST by upsdriver ((Hunter for Pres/ Ann Coulter Sec, of State))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher

I like Karl Rove still do he is still mediocate bastard he got do something give this Borg on his side ROFL


23 posted on 02/12/2007 9:08:16 PM PST by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

24 posted on 02/12/2007 9:08:39 PM PST by nutmeg (National Security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofie

I have to focus on local elections this year.. Sheesch, their gonna hog all the money out there for local candidates. They do it all the time.

This is too much to early. I agree.


25 posted on 02/12/2007 9:08:52 PM PST by The Mayor ( http://albanysinsanity.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Rove had nothing to do with the 2006 losses. Blame the House and Senate for spending like drunken sailors.


26 posted on 02/12/2007 9:11:42 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

I really don't know. I did hear that Karl exerted a lot of influence in the last two elections for that reason. It could be bull.

BTW, you have mail.


27 posted on 02/12/2007 9:12:08 PM PST by streetpreacher (What if you're wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

It was almost the last 24 hours. I really don't get what they were thinking.


28 posted on 02/12/2007 9:13:34 PM PST by streetpreacher (What if you're wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher
You don't expect me to back up anything I say here with facts, do you?

I read it somewhere.


I usually respond with something like this:

"Maybe you don't want to know about any of my bizarre delusions, but perhaps you won't be so dismissive when you learn that whole teams of court-ordered psychiatrists find it absolutely fascinating."
29 posted on 02/12/2007 9:15:35 PM PST by Jaysun (I've never paid for sex in my life. And that's really pissed off a lot of prostitutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Rove had nothing to do with the 2006 losses. Blame the House and Senate for spending like drunken sailors.

Even if that were true, Rove could have suggested Bush issue a veto on a spending bill now and then, instead of the NONE he actually issued. We lost 2006 because of Iraq, with a smaller but significant assist from Mark Foley and his none-too-proactive bosses, plus a Macaca or two.

30 posted on 02/12/2007 9:20:06 PM PST by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher

BTW, you have mail.

Back to you.


31 posted on 02/12/2007 9:25:48 PM PST by upsdriver ((Hunter for Pres/ Ann Coulter Sec, of State))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Luke21

Karl Rove is a loser? Please, how do you define a Winner?


32 posted on 02/12/2007 9:27:08 PM PST by neverhillorat (IF THE RATS WIN, WE ALL LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverhillorat

Exactly! A baseball player makes an out 7 out of 10 at bats over his career and he makes it into the hall of fame. Rove has one setback and he's a loser?


33 posted on 02/12/2007 9:36:07 PM PST by upsdriver ((Hunter for Pres/ Ann Coulter Sec, of State))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver
I think Rove wanted them to take 06 as part of a greater strategy. Look at how little he seemed to care at the time.
He's playing a long term game, don't underestimate him.
34 posted on 02/12/2007 10:00:40 PM PST by johnny33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: woofie

That may be why Newt is biding his time. He understands the timing so he may hit the hustings right on time. Of the choices we currently have, I prefer Newt.


35 posted on 02/12/2007 10:15:41 PM PST by Mogollon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny33

My opinion is that Rove and Bush,etc. were totally blindsided by the election of '06. I don't think they really believed that people would vote for a party that offered nothing and against a strong economy and the war on terror. I didn't either!

But that's water under the bridge now. We need to win it all back in '08.


36 posted on 02/12/2007 10:22:35 PM PST by upsdriver ((Hunter for Pres/ Ann Coulter Sec, of State))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: neodad


For old times sake.
37 posted on 02/12/2007 10:22:35 PM PST by BJClinton (articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"I reckun Karl has been lurking here a bit is how he reaches this conclusion. "

Yup. Copied one of my comments almost word for word. Here's another one for you, Rove- Get a spine! The "duh, look at me, I'm licking a RATS balls" is demeaning. Does nothing for your image.

38 posted on 02/12/2007 10:27:00 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

LOL! You talking about conservatives?


39 posted on 02/12/2007 10:28:37 PM PST by jwh_Denver ("Planet of the Apes" happened because people wouldn't proof read their posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: woofie

These guys are right. All of them have worn out their welcome with me -- Romney, McCain, Giulliani -- all of them except for Duncan Hunter.


40 posted on 02/12/2007 10:33:03 PM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson