I have saved it and will repost it at every opportunity. The clueless right here on FR, for whatever reason, ignorance, stupidity, political correctness, kum-ba-ya syndrome, whatever, still refuse to see the obvious.
I hope that you don't mind my "borrowing" it.
The vast majority of crazed killers in the US are "Christian", meaning they grew up in a family that was at least nominally Christian. But we almost never see their religious affiliation mentioned unless they have explicitly cited it as a motivation and/or have been involved in "Christian" groups that promote violence (e.g. Timothy McVeigh). Why should we apply a different standard to Muslims? A list of violent acts committed by nominal Muslims isn't meaningful without a comparison list of violent acts committed by nominal Christians, Jews, Hindus, atheists, etc., and a breakdown of the representation of each in the population in question.
Note the CNN (i.e. MSM) article at this link http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1785542/posts?page=1 which mentions the Serbian massacre of thousands of Bosnian Muslims, while neglecting to mention that the Serbs are Christians.