Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Monk Dimittis

-"It is a difficult issue to get a handle on," he said. "I don't know what they can do."-

It's really quite simple. If you have people who are so dangerous you can't let them near children, you keep them locked up. I'm thinking we have to lock up the enforcers as well, because they're clearly stupid.


3 posted on 02/15/2007 11:48:50 AM PST by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AmericanChef
"The law does not appear to have had any appreciable impact on sex crimes"

If they sexually assaulted a child, they should be NEUTERED and then put in prison.
7 posted on 02/15/2007 11:52:39 AM PST by NewCenturions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanChef
If you have people who are so dangerous you can't let them near children, you keep them locked up.

Yep. And for some, you make their probation requirements extra supervised; medium risk, low risk, etc.

By lumping such a huge range of offenses into one category and treating everyone in the category as if they were the worst, the system has become both meaningless and unpractical.

13 posted on 02/15/2007 12:26:18 PM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson