Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi: Speaker’s Jet Not Good Enough for Me
gopusa.com ^ | Bobby Eberle

Posted on 02/16/2007 8:27:53 PM PST by Iam1ru1-2

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is proving once again that the Democrat label of “party of the people” is simply that: a label. Now, the San Francisco liberal is complaining about the size of the House speaker’s jet and requesting one much larger than Republican Dennis Hastert was provided.

As noted in a FOX News story, following the attacks of September 11, 2001, “the Pentagon agreed to provide the House speaker, who is second in the line of presidential succession, with a military plane for added security during trips back home.”


C-20 twin-engine aircraft

Republican Dennis Hastert was the first speaker of the House to be provided with this service, and he used a commuter-style jet to get him back to his home in Illinois. The jet at his disposal was a C-20 twin-engine aircraft. House Speaker Pelosi has requested the use of a C-32 aircraft, which is the military equivalent of a Boeing 757.

According to a story in the Washington Times, that Pelosi’s staff “was pressing the Department of Defense for an Air Force aircraft large enough to fly nonstop to San Francisco. She also has pressed to be able to include other members of the California congressional delegation, her family members and her staff on the plane.”

Republicans have accused Pelosi of “extravagance” and of wanting a plane where she could reward friends and associates. The Washington Times reports that “the Pentagon denied a request by Mrs. Pelosi to fly on a military aircraft to last weekend’s Democratic retreat in Williamsburg, a two-hour drive from Washington.”

In order to counter the criticism from Republicans and to turn the story around, Pelosi is now blaming administration officials for twisting the story:

These “misrepresentations could be coming from the administration,” she told reporters yesterday.

“One would only have to wonder why,” she said, though adding that she did not suspect President Bush “because he has impressed upon me over and over again the need for me to have the security that I need.”


C-32 Military Aircraft

The Pentagon said yesterday that Pelosi would not be provided with the C-32 which is estimated to cost in excess of $22,000 per hour to operate. In a letter to the speaker, the Pentagon’s ruling “essentially limits her to the commuter plane used by former Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, which requires refueling to travel from Washington to Mrs. Pelosi’s San Francisco district. A second source, in the Bush administration, confirmed the contents of the letter.”

According to the Times, “the letter stipulates that the Air Force will only fly her between Washington and her San Francisco district and places limits on who can travel with her. ”

If there is one thing the voters made clear in November, it is that they are tired of politicians putting themselves over their constituents. They are elected to serve, not to be served. Pelosi has a long way to go to learn that lesson.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: environmentalist; hypocrit; liar; sanfrannan; ultraliberal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: potlatch


LOL!

Fly away!


41 posted on 02/16/2007 10:17:07 PM PST by devolve ( ........upload images free & fast at tinypic.com or Photobucket or Imagecave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Lol indeed, I thought you had flown the coop!!


42 posted on 02/16/2007 10:19:02 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
The reason she won't stop in Kansas is she is afraid a house will land on her.
Pretty funny. :)
43 posted on 02/16/2007 10:27:23 PM PST by Bittersweetmd (God is Great and greatly to be praised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BillaryBeGone

The Gulfstream 500 also has a range of over 4000 miles.


44 posted on 02/16/2007 10:41:29 PM PST by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tdscpa
Maybe she can keep on going towards the Dole properties on Maui and land somewhere in between.
45 posted on 02/16/2007 10:46:18 PM PST by jws3sticks (Hillary can take a very long walk on a very short pier, anytime, and the sooner the better!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
Or does environmentalism only apply to us peons?

Didn't you know? "Environmentalism", like taxes and what not, is only for the "little people"! (You know, stiffs like you and me!)

CA....

46 posted on 02/16/2007 10:55:30 PM PST by Chances Are (Whew! It seems I've once again found that silly grin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Pelosi wants the airplane because it is supposedly a security issue. Right after 9/11 - there was a lot of uncertainty. But much of that uncertainty has gone, as we have gathered intelligence and have reduced the risk of secret terrorist cells in the U.S.

Yet Pelosi is treating the entire situation as if Pres. Bush is over-reacting. If Pres. Bush is over-reacting - what is the security issue that Pelosi is worried about?

Pelosi's actions and votes suggest that there is NO security issue. Also, her votes would undermine our efforts to stop terrorists, and would make the nation less safe. She should be told that there is no way she should get an Air Force plane.

Mike


47 posted on 02/16/2007 10:55:56 PM PST by Vineyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

Now THAT'S funny!


48 posted on 02/16/2007 10:59:18 PM PST by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob

You think this is bad? Wait until a Democrat is elected President in 2008.


49 posted on 02/16/2007 11:03:30 PM PST by MinorityRepublican (Everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2; All
Hey! Nancy, Nancy, bo-ancy
Banana-fana, fo-fancy
Fee-fi-mo-ancy
Nancy!

You have 2 options:

QUIZ: Which would be the quickest and most efficient?

50 posted on 02/16/2007 11:29:23 PM PST by OnRightOnLeftCoast (Not to be confused with similar-name pirate RightOnLeftCoast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peggybac
I liked it because it reads "Fantasy Flyer" on the side. Fitting IMO.

/Salute
MaxMax.

51 posted on 02/16/2007 11:48:44 PM PST by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob
This is the speaker of the house? This speaker, the democrat senators and congressman are the type of whining socialist fairies we would make fun of if they were running France.

Isn't that what we're doing? ;o)

52 posted on 02/16/2007 11:57:57 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

I'd almost hope that any military pilot would refuse to fly her. And if they do fly, I hope they give her one hell of a ride!


53 posted on 02/17/2007 12:04:42 AM PST by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
Why doesn't she ask Donald Trump to fly her and spare the poor taxpayer the expense of her extravagance?

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

54 posted on 02/17/2007 12:05:35 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

she wants a retired concorde jet.


55 posted on 02/17/2007 12:06:52 AM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

Or maybe an SR-71 spy place or even a C-5....


56 posted on 02/17/2007 1:55:20 AM PST by 4KennewickMan2Invent (I didn't pay attention in school, I was too busy trying to learn something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2; All
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
57 posted on 02/17/2007 1:58:46 AM PST by musicman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Kinda sounds like another liberal politician: CNN: "on one appearance at a 2005 tsunami fundraiser for which Giuliani received $100,000, and also mentions a contract stipulation that the former New York City mayor be given the use of a "private aircraft -- must be a Gulfstream 4 or bigger."


58 posted on 02/17/2007 2:17:58 AM PST by SeaBiscuit (God Bless America..Duncan Hunter 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4KennewickMan2Invent

ll, How about the flying wing.


59 posted on 02/17/2007 6:42:22 AM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
The Pentagon said yesterday that Pelosi would not be provided with the C-32 which is estimated to cost in excess of $22,000 per hour to operate.

I hope that's true, but I have to wonder because of the following inaccurate statement: In a letter to the speaker, the Pentagon’s ruling “essentially limits her to the commuter plane used by former Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, which requires refueling to travel from Washington to Mrs. Pelosi’s San Francisco district.

As shown many times right on this thread, no refueling is necessary.

According to the Times, “the letter stipulates that the Air Force will only fly her between Washington and her San Francisco district and places limits on who can travel with her. ”

I hope there's only one mistake this article--refueling, and I hope the Pentagon et al do not CAVE on this. Please.

60 posted on 02/17/2007 7:02:53 AM PST by Sal (Once you know they sold USA out to Red China, what do you think they would NOT do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson