A Message to Rudy Giuliani and His Supporters (VANITY)

Self | February 23, 2007 | Alberta's Child

[TommyDale]

What you do about your own morals is up to you.

[CindyDawg]

No one should be trying to change anyone's opinion. People should vote for who they please. We can put out info on why we feel our candidate is a better choice but IMO that is as far as it should go. No one should be coerced or threatened.

[Al Simmons]

There are sadly, a number of people around here who have gone well beyond civil discourse in discussing their disagreements with Giuliani's past stated positions. THOSE are the people my post was directed at.

[TommyDale]

I have not decided on a candidate at this early point in the campaign. It will not be Giuliani, however, under any circumstances.

[Hydroshock]

The republican party does nto own my vote. I will vote for teh cnadidate who best reperesents my views, no matter his or her party. I can tell you this Rino Rudy does not and will never get my vote.

[org.whodat]

And it only took a week for him to go from penthouse to outhouse once his views were brought to light.

and to officially canned on 2/16/07.

[LtdGovt]

You're from Michigan?

[TommyDale]

You are delusional.

[OMalley]

I havent noticed anyhere:-)

Havent met a single conservative that plans on voting for Rudy. But my sister and her friends (lefties) are already going at it!

[LtdGovt]

What you do about your own morals is up to you.

I agree. But apprantly, some Religious Right organisations feel an incessant need to interfere with 'immoral behavior'.

[LtdGovt]

You are delusional.

It was a joke! Look at what he wrote. He wrote (paraphrased): "The3 number of people who will vote for a third party"

[kaotic133]

I'm glad I'm not the only one who sees the obvious conflict between the concept of freedom and the concept of religiously idealized government.

[El Laton Caliente]

Dunno...

The Dems have gun control, an attack on the Bill of Rights, in their party's platform; I simply cannot, will not go there.

Rudy is against the Second amendment personally; I cannot and will not go there.

What's a person to do; Go third party and buy more ammo?

[You Dirty Rats]

Be careful or you will get entered into the "little red book" by the Barney Fife of Free Republic.

[Reagan Man]

You're way off base, Registered. Always respected you and your wonderful graphics, but on this issue, you're DEADWRONG.

You've been here long enough to understand how things operate. Each thread that is posted on Free Republic is equivalent to a separate "internet magazine" publication. FReepers number in the 200,000 plus range. A good percentage of that 200K is a good representation of how many FReepers are serious about their surfing around the internets premier conservative website. Not to mention the thousands of Lurkers that come and go, hour after hour, day after day, week after week. See what I mean?

IOW, if you want your opinion to reach the most FReepers and Lurkers, and have the most widespread exposure to the internet public at large, this is the way to do it. Posting the same factual account once, on multiple threads, is not spamming. If it was, JimRob would have removed most of Spiff's posts and article threads for that matter, a long time ago.

What Spiff is doing, and what I do with my anti-Rudy posts and threads, is called getting your message out. And it works. Its part of that 1st amendment thing called, free speech. The Founders were passionate about their political dissent and they wanted to assure future generations had the same right to freedom of speech they had in the beginning.

[Lakeshark]

Yep. Are you?

Love it here.......but we have economic problems beyond words. Jenny G. will likely put us into permanent recession.

[TommyDale]

"But apprantly, some Religious Right organisations feel an incessant need to interfere with 'immoral behavior'."

You should take that up with those individual organizations. They do not speak for the Religious Right as a whole, just as you don't speak for Republicans as a whole.