To: pissant
There's nothing nonsensical about that. Do you think it's just a coincidence that Rupert Murdoch's media outlets have been Rudy Giuliani's biggest cheerleaders?
28 posted on
02/23/2007 8:12:30 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: Alberta's Child
Absolute nonsense. The difference between those who would vote for Rudy in the general election and those who would not, is that the former group understands the importance of the war on terror. Does that make them neocons? Thanks, I consider that to be a compliment.
34 posted on
02/23/2007 8:15:45 AM PST by
LtdGovt
("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: Alberta's Child
Looking for a candidate to support is hard for us on this forum, because conservatives have no one, not one, who is a great or even good candidate yet. They are either liberal leaning, not qualified, no name recognition, no executive experience, or scarred by the MSM beyond repair.
I think need to take a deep breathe with your anti-Rudy screeds. Honestly, will you support Hillary rather than him if he wins the nomination?
49 posted on
02/23/2007 8:22:29 AM PST by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: Alberta's Child
What does Rupert Murdoch have to do with the term neocon. He's a long established slightly right of center Aussie media mogul, whose ideas about US politics, British politics or Aussie politics I'm completely uninterested in.
The term neocon is used as a pejorative when you don't even know what it means.
80 posted on
02/23/2007 8:45:29 AM PST by
pissant
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson