Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: monkapotamus; bannie

All the juries I've been on have been interesting...they just seem to come at inconvenient times. d:o) It amazes me how diffently 12 people can hear the same things, and not understand what breaking the law means.

1. This is what the law says.
2. This is what the person did.
3. They broke the law.

But, but, but...what if.... *sigh*


1,514 posted on 02/25/2007 2:33:02 PM PST by Kathy in Alaska (~ God Bless and Protect Our Brave Protectors of Freedom~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1492 | View Replies ]


To: Kathy in Alaska
Usually it's number 2 that's the problem, and you're not all sure what the person did, just what everyone says the person did.

Granted, there are times when you know and yet people are still idiots, probably because the lawyers are going for that jury nullification thing, which would never work with me. I'd save the "special circumstances" thing for the judge to consider when considering leniency in sentencing.

1,516 posted on 02/25/2007 2:40:18 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (A husband is what's left of a sweetheart after the nerve has been killed. -- Lou Costello)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1514 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson