Posted on 02/28/2007 4:55:36 PM PST by Sub-Driver
unnamed sources...
the usual BS
I can smell the BS from here.
From one of the most far-left and anti-USA tabloids in a country full of them.
The guardian is a disgusting little rag.
Well...maybe.
Note that despite the spin being put on it, that the real issue is not Baghdad or Iraq...it's the politics at home that are the issue...as in Vietnam.
Well, since the Democrats are in the majority, and their leadership has said they are doing what they can to make this another Vietnam, our military would be daft not to see the possibility of it coming about.
Note the fear that there will be a "lack of troops". Nobody fears we will send too many more troops off "to die for a lost cause".
Who says the Democrats and their doppelgangers in the MSM can NOT brain wash the masses?
Well-I do think we need to show some solid improvement within 6 months. If things go south from here, people will not continue supporting this...not that I agree-it's just reality...we don't like losing wars.
Did Vietnam ever have an oil deal?
THIS is why we need a declaration of war BEFORE any use of troops is authorized. To allow open debate on the morality, strategies, or duration of a war while our troops are in the field is a recipe for disaster.
The president should have gone to Congress on September 12 with a declaration of war against Iraq and Afghanistan. If he had, we could have simply censored all news of Iraq, allowing our forces to have done what they needed to have done to destroy all opposition in those countries. They could have blasted the Taliban out of their caves with napalm, installed a MacArthur style occupation regime in Iraq, and simply shot anyone who caused any trouble. The US commander could have established a 100-mile-wide cordon sanitare around the borders of Iraq and killed anyone crossing it without authorization, thus shutting down the Iranian and Syrian enablers. Our forces could have sealed each Iraqi city in turn, rousting the population from their homes and forcing them to pass through search-and-arrest checkpoints, thus weeding out the "insurgents" in each village. Baghdad could have been evacuated neighborhood by neighborhood in like manner, then bombed and bulldozed flat, thus breaking the will to resist of the ethnic militias; Sunni and Shiite militia leaders could then have been rounded up, tried by military tribunals, then shot, nipping the militia problem in the bud. And the Kurds could have been allowed to form an independent state, giving our forces a secure base for future operations.
Instead, we have another quasi-war -- and another mess to clean up.
Can Gen. Petraeus do it? I hope he can. But no matter how good our forces are, and how great the leaders we give them, there's always the Congress standing behind them, ever ready to yank the rug out from under them should the politcal heat from the TV-addled masses get too hot.
Coulda, shoulda, woulda. As long as our forces operate at the whim of the political class, nothing -- least of all victory -- can be certain.
The U.S. hasn't fought a war like that since 1945, and I knew even on the morning of 9/11/01 that it wouldn't do it again in this case.
Amen to that. We haven't had an out-and-out win since WWII. And I chalk it partly up to politicians being able to convince people over time that it's not a real war or it's unjust, etc.
This war may turn into Vietnam, but it's not Bush's fault, or Rumsfeld's fault, or the military' fault. It's the Democrats fault (along with weak-kneed Republicans who voted for the non-binding resolution) and the media's fault.
SHOUT IT OUT PEOPLE
THE DEMOCRATS HAVE KILLED OFF THE MILITARY'S MORALE
Don't kid yourself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.