Posted on 03/06/2007 4:35:39 PM PST by NormsRevenge
Reasons given for asking six U.S. attorneys to resign, according to William Moschella, an associate deputy attorney general. He testified Tuesday before the House Judiciary Committee.
Carol Lam, the U.S. attorney in San Diego
_VIOLENT CRIME: "Her gun prosecution numbers are at the bottom of the list."
_IMMIGRATION: "Her numbers for a border district just didn't stack up."
___
John McKay, the U.S. attorney in Seattle
_POLICY DIFFERENCES: "The department really had policy differences and were concerned with the manner in which he went about advocating the particular policies ... on information sharing. He spent quite a considerable amount of time advocating for a particular system."
___
Bud Cummins, the U.S. attorney in Little Rock, Ark.
_NOT PERFORMANCED-BASED: "His was not for performance-based reasons. ... The administration asked Mr. Cummins to move on only after we knew that he had indicated he was not going to serve out the remainder of his term."
___
Daniel Bogden, the U.S. attorney for Nevada
_NEW BLOOD: "There was no particular deficiency. There was an interest in seeing renewed energy and renewed vigor in that office, really taking it to the next level."
___
David Iglesias, the U.S. attorney for New Mexico
_TIRED: "The district was in need of greater leadership. ... Mr. Iglesias had delegated to his first assistant the overall running of his office. U.S. attorneys are hired to run the office."
___
Paul Charlton, the U.S. attorney in Arizona
_FBI TAPING POLICY: "Mr. Charlton had undertaken in his district a policy with regard to the taping of FBI interviews and set a policy in place there that had national ramifications. It did not go through the whole policy process."
_DEATH PENALTY: "On the death penalty, we have a process in the Department of Justice. It is the one area that is non-delegable by the attorney general which (Mr. Charlton), in a particular case was told and authorized to seek in a particular case. He chose instead to continue to litigate after that long and exhaustive process."
Bump
When Clinton got into office didn't he fire all District Attorneys?
Yes. every one of them. an unprecedented move, btw.
That's what I recall. And replaced them with prosecutors of his choosing.
So what's the problem? Is this just another Bush bashing hearing?
Clinton fired everyone when he took office, to give them as rewards to supporters.
Bush was STOOOOOPID not to have fired EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM!
Is this just another Bush bashing hearing?
--
That was never my intent. This list fwiw is an additional piece of info and was posted to let folks make up their own minds, nothing more.
***When Clinton got into office didn't he fire all District Attorneys?***
Yes. But George Bush left intact the whole Clinton team. Part of the "new tone".
Scooter paid the price for "new tone" today.
At least we have to give him credit to asking the "bench warmers" to play nice. As usual they couldn't and still can't. I wouldn't have Bush's job if they gave it to me. He's there for a divine reason, and votes of course, IMHO and maybe one day we will see the big picture./p>
update to original posting..
some review info as well..
--
Reasons given for prosecutors firings
The Associated Press
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070307/ap_on_go_co/prosecutors_why_fired;_ylt=ArHqGjcqCg_8oKaK3ImsIYKyFz4D
What the Justice Department has said about six U.S. attorneys who were asked to resign. Under each prosecutor are comments from previous department-issued performances reviews and then statements Tuesday by William Moschella, an associate deputy attorney general, about the reasons given that the prosecutors were asked to step down. He testified before a House Judiciary subcommittee.
CAROL LAM, U.S. attorney in San Diego
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TESTIMONY: "Her gun prosecution numbers are at the bottom of the list. ... (On immigration cases), her numbers for a border district just didn't stack up."
2005 PERFORMANCE REVIEW: "An effective manager and respected leader ... respected by the judiciary, law enforcement agencies, and (U.S. attorney's office) staff."
___
JOHN McKAY, U.S. attorney in Seattle
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TESTIMONY: "The department really had policy differences and were concerned with the manner in which he went about advocating the particular policies ... on information sharing. He spent quite a considerable amount of time advocating for a particular system."
2006 PERFORMANCE REVIEW: "An effective, well-regarded and capable leader ... (who) established strategic goals that were appropriate to meet the priorities of the department."
___
BUD CUMMINS, U.S. attorney in Little Rock, Ark.
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TESTIMONY: "His was not for performance-based reasons. ... The administration asked Mr. Cummins to move on only after we knew that he had indicated he was not going to serve out the remainder of his term."
2006 PERFORMANCE REVIEW: "Very competent and highly regarded by the federal judiciary, law enforcement and civil client agencies. ... Established strategic goals that were appropriate to meet the priorities of the department."
___
DANIEL BOGDEN, U.S. attorney for Nevada
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TESTIMONY: "There was no particular deficiency. There was an interest in seeing renewed energy and renewed vigor in that office, really taking it to the next level."
2003 PERFORMANCE REVIEW: "Highly regarded by the federal judiciary, the law enforcement and civil client agencies, and the staff of the (U.S. attorney's office). He was a capable leader."
___
DAVID IGLESIAS, U.S. attorney for New Mexico
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TESTIMONY: "The district was in need of greater leadership. ... Mr. Iglesias had delegated to his first assistant the overall running of his office. U.S. attorneys are hired to run the office."
2005 PERFORMANCE REVIEW: "Experienced in legal, management and community relations work and was respected by the judiciary, agencies and staff. ... Had a well conceived strategic plan that complied with department priorities."
___
PAUL CHARLTON, U.S. attorney in Arizona
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TESTIMONY: "Mr. Charlton had undertaken in his district a policy with regard to the taping of FBI interviews and set a policy in place there that had national ramifications. It did not go through the whole policy process. ... On the death penalty, we have a process in the Department of Justice. It is the one area that is nondelegable by the attorney general which (Mr. Charlton), in a particular case was told and authorized to seek in a particular case. He chose instead to continue to litigate after that long and exhaustive process."
2003 PERFORMANCE REVIEW: "Well respected by the (U.S. attorney's office) staff, investigative and civil client agencies, local law enforcement community, Native American nations, and judiciary regarding his integrity, professionalism and competence."
ATTORNEY GENERAL SEEKS RESIGNATIONS FROM PROSECUTORS
*Please Note: Archive articles do not include photos, charts or graphics. More information. March 24, 1993, Wednesday
By DAVID JOHNSTON, (Special to The New York Times); National Desk
Late Edition - Final, Section A, Page 1, Column 1, 1053 words
DISPLAYING ABSTRACT - Attorney General Janet Reno today demanded the prompt resignation of all United States Attorneys, leading the Federal prosecutor in the District of Columbia to suggest that the order could be tied to his long-running investigation of Representative Dan Rostenkowski, a crucial ally of President Clinton.
(Just copied and pasted this from the NYT site. I will not give them ANY money, but the information is out there for the rest of the MSM to examine, that is if they want to believe the NYT!)
But these are prosecutors, so it's different... therefore it's Bush-bad, Clinton-good, as usual.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.