I'm calling anybody a liar who states I said anyone controlled the media. There's a big difference between using and controlling.
I was there every day during that time and we vigilers fought constantly for any attention at all from the media.
That was exactly my point! Go back and read my posts before jumping to any conclusions about what I said.
Meanwhile, they focused their cameras and mikes on the few supporters of Michael, some of whom confessed to me were PAID to disrupt.
I watched the news coverage daily. You folks brought them in with your protests, not the Schiavos. That they also went to Schiavo and his attorney for balance does not imply they didn't spend a lot of time with your side. I saw all of the flags and crucifixes your side desecrated. I saw the young children being sent out to get arrested so the news could see them in handcuffs. I listened to Randall Terry and quite a few others from your side. You all got the publicity you fought for, but didn't like what America thought about it. Don't blame the media when you all brought them in.
Matter of fact those very few disruptors are very easy to remember because they behaved in a way similar to you, i.e. snotty, obnoxious, and liberal.
I think snotty and obnoxious belongs in the camp of people who fear the truth and try and get anyone banned who is not in complete sympathy with their crusade. As for liberal, I don't know where you get that from. I'm about as conservative as they come, and as a conservative, I reject extremism in all its ugly forms.
You ever notice how when someone can't break down the message, they try insulting the messenger? It's usually the sure sign of a vacuous argument.
I hope you are decent enough to apologize to T'wit for that accusation and prove wrong my impression. 8mm
I will apologize to all here for anything I said that was not truthful. I apologize to no one who tries to change either the context or facts of what I said.
This tells me a whole lot. In case you haven't noticed, a lot of us conservatives do not share your wide eyed acceptance of the media.
Also, "you folks" implies we are of a different philosophy. I am a Reaganite who is pro-life. How about you?
I think snotty and obnoxious belongs in the camp of people who fear the truth and try and get anyone banned who is not in complete sympathy with their crusade. As for liberal, I don't know where you get that from. I'm about as conservative as they come, and as a conservative, I reject extremism in all its ugly forms.
You can say, scream, and shout that you are conservative, but your words speak otherwise.
A perfect example of liberal-think is your projection that we fear the truth and are extremists. Thousands and thousands of posts on Terri's Legacy in the past two years show to any who reasons calmly that we are the ones holding the evidence, the facts, the truths, much of it eyewitness, and the left, the trolls, the communists, and even the terrorists are the ones showing the traits you propose. Haters call people they hate haters. A good example of that approach, an angered accusing approach is make famous by the blogger for Edwards.
You sound just like the Mikey supporters the media fawned over at Pinellas Park, attacking decent conservatives from all across the spectrum, wreaking wrath at their faith, even.
One of the things you may wish to do is take a peek at the top of your screen. It says FreeRepublic. Maybe you didn't realize you were on a FreeRepublic thread.
FWIW, you're spot on, and if those who are flaming you would slow down and read what you are saying, they'd have to agree.