OK!
Now, how long before it becomes effective?
We think the Second Amendment was similarly structured. The prefatory language announcing the desirability of a wellregulated militiaeven bearing in mind the breadth of the concept of a militiais narrower than the guarantee of an individual right to keep and bear arms. The Amendment does not protect the right of militiamen to keep and bear arms, but rather the right of the people. The operative clause, properly read, protects the ownership and use of weaponry beyond that needed to preserve the state militias. Again, we point out that if the competent drafters of the Second Amendment had meant the right to be limited to the protection of state militias, it is hard to imagine that they would have chosen the language they did. We therefore take it as an expression of the drafters view that the people possessed a natural right to keep and bear arms, and that the preservation of the militia was the rights most salient political benefitand thus the most appropriate to express in a political document.
W00t!!!
The instant the gavel came down.