Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steel Wolf
they'd be more open for the banning of handguns (as they are more useful in crime than in warfare) than for any restrictions on rifles, machine guns, or heavier items. Just my take, anyway.

The same thing that makes them useful to criminals makes them useful for little old ladies protecting themselves against criminals as well: They are small, easy to operate, and powerful enough to do the job. Self-defense is important as well, and I think the framers understood that.

421 posted on 03/09/2007 12:43:35 PM PST by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies ]


To: coloradan
The same thing that makes them useful to criminals makes them useful for little old ladies protecting themselves against criminals as well:

That's a good point too, and I don't deny the logic there. We live in a very different world than they did, and things like that probably weren't on their radar.

466 posted on 03/09/2007 1:25:13 PM PST by Steel Wolf (If every Republican is a RINO, then no Republican is a RINO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson