[Abundy]

Miller?

The case that stands, on a procedural basis, for an individual right interpretation of the second amendment?

you'll go toe-to-toe to defend Miller?

Really?

If you don't agree that Miller demonstrates that the Second Amendment deals with an individual right then you are either an uneducated windbag, a shill or both.

And I'm betting you can't identify my argument within 60 seconds.

[Abundy]

8:22:31

the clock is ticking...what is my argument?

[robertpaulsen]

"And I'm betting you can't identify my argument within 60 seconds."

I'll bet you can't identify your argument in 60 years.

"If you don't agree that Miller demonstrates that the Second Amendment deals with an individual right then you are either an uneducated windbag, a shill or both."

A demonstration of an individual right? You're sure about that?

OK then. Why did the U.S. Supreme Court even mention "militia"? If Miller was about an individual right to keep and bear arms, what the heck does a militia have to do with anything?

[robertpaulsen]

"you'll go toe-to-toe to defend Miller?"

Huh?

I told the poster that I will go toe-to-toe with him and debate the Miller decision.