Intelligent Design Scientists Will Showcase Evidence Challenging Evolution

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=3916&program=DI%20Main%20Page%20-%20News&callingPage=discoMainPage ^

[Alter Kaker]

The conference is $55 for General Admission

There's no business like show business.

[ASA Vet]

Intelligent Design Scientists

OXYMORON ALERT!

[adorno]

The conference is $55 for General Admission

There's no business like show business.

I'll just wait for YouTube to post a video of the conference. A lot cheaper.

[EarthBound]

Someone probably would've said the same thing to Galileo or Copernicus, I'm sure.

[Jedi Master Pikachu]

crevoping.

[Jedi Master Pikachu]

Creationism.

[Alter Kaker]

Someone probably would've said the same thing to Galileo or Copernicus, I'm sure.

Galileo and Copernicus charged the general public for glitzy Power Point displays? LOL

[EarthBound]

You know what I'm talking about Alter. Let's attempt to keep things civil.

[microgood]

The Theory of Evolution

[canuck_conservative]

Intelligent Design "Scientists"



Bwaaaaahahahaha!!!

Thanks for the laugh.

[Alter Kaker]

You know what I'm talking about Alter.

I'm not sure I do. You seem to be comparing a bunch of second rate polemicists (Behe, Meyer, et al) with Copernicus and Galileo. Do I really need to dignify that with a response? Just to play along for a moment... what, exactly have they discovered?

[Jedi Master Pikachu]

Galileo and Copernicus were hounded for their ideas contrary to the establishment of the day.

Sort of hypocritical when such "ardent supporters" of Galileo and Copernicus hound Creationists.

As with Galileo and Copernicus, let them present their evidence--and then let science take its course.

[Jedi Master Pikachu]

If you didn't get EarthBound's point, then you can read comment 13. Somewhat the same basic idea.

[Alter Kaker]

Galileo and Copernicus were hounded for their ideas contrary to the establishment of the day.

The "establishment" (whatever the heck that means) has "hounded" (whatever the heck that means) legitimate scientists. It has also rejected the work of innumerable hordes of frauds, fakes and charlatans. Is being rejected by mainstream science your gold standard for authenticity?

[EarthBound]

As usual, you manage to use a good deal more tact than I could. Yes, that is what I was saying.

[js1138]

I take it Michael Denton will not be presenting.

[Jedi Master Pikachu]

Don't count yourself short, you did a great job at explaining.

Opinion: your point was figuratively crystal clear; Alter Kaker just chose not to understand it.

[js1138]

This looks an awful lot like and advertisement. Isn't that against the rules on FR?

[fish hawk]

Isn't it ironic how the left always spews that there can't be science involved in Creationism but push science in Evolutionism, which is basically a theory, philosophy, with no more proof than Creationism, and demands the same amount of "faith".