D'Souza is an appeaser. He wants us to change our way of life so that the terrorists won't blow us up. Now, for you social conservatives who don't have a problem with that, imagine how you'd feel if D'Souza or any pundit said, "We should just give Israel back to the Islamists. That would solve the problem. They won't hate us anymore, and they won't blow us up!"
Appeasement by any other name is still appeasement.
Okay.
Are we allowed to change our way of life in the direction he proposes because it is the right thing to do?
Would the terrorists win if Britney wore underwear?
"D'Souza is an appeaser."
I agree with that descriptor, but his almost fanatical veal to promote H-I-S concept of Islamic distain for a corrupt western culture as the driving force of their warfare strikes me as simply a form of social-scientific hubris. As in "it's my unique theory, I thought of it first, and I'm going to promote it." Maybe it will sell some books.
D'Souza is an appeaser. He wants us to change our way of life so that the terrorists won't blow us up.
It's the social libs who are changing our way of life through activist judges.