[Old Professer]

“The likelihood is that it will be held that there is an individual right that gives way to a strong, specific state interest expressed in a relatively narrowly tailored legislative provision, under some type of ‘intermediate scrutiny’ test.”

Now, you couldn’t state it more clearly than that if you used five times as many words.

[robertpaulsen]

“The likelihood is that it will be held that there is an individual right that gives way to a strong, specific state interest expressed in a relatively narrowly tailored legislative provision, under some type of ‘intermediate scrutiny’ test.”

Gosh, he really went out on a limb with THAT prediction, huh?

I think it would be hilarious if the U.S. Supreme Court followed the principle suggested by theMiller court and ruled the AWB unconstitutional since all those weapons have a military use and cannot be prohibited.

Ol' Sarah would have a heart attack.