Posted on 03/31/2007 2:55:53 AM PDT by FairOpinion
Republican Rudy Giuliani could win the Keystone State in the 2008 United States presidential election, according to a poll by the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute. 46 per cent of respondents in Pennsylvania would support the former New York City mayor, while 42 per cent would vote for Democratic New York senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Giuliani also holds a seven-point lead over Illinois senator Barack Obama, and a nine-point edge over former North Carolina senator John Edwards.
In other match-ups, Arizona senator John McCain is tied with Obama, trails Rodham Clinton by one point, and leads Edwards by one point. The three Democratic presidential hopefuls hold the upper hand in contests against former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney.
In 2004, Democratic nominee John Kerry carried Pennsylvania’s 21 electoral votes, with 51 per cent of the vote. No Republican has won the Keystone State since George H. Bush in 1988.
(Excerpt) Read more at angus-reid.com ...
Would you rather see this Barrack Hussein Obama threat become a reality?
What the heck is going on in our country. Who are these idiotic, good-for-nothing inbecils who would want to see this equally idiotic Hussein become PRESIDENT?
What's going on?
LOL. It is also possible based on these data that Rudy could have 49% and Hillary only 39% but you ignore that.
Rudy over Hillary by several percentage points has been a robust finding, repeatedly reported by pollsters over the past few months. I havent seen a single poll showing her ahead in PA. Unless voter opinion of him changes he would be very likely to carry both PA and NJ in a race against her.
Unfortunetly for you, many of us disagree.
Given the choice of Rion Rudy or any dem, I do not see much of a difference and will not vote for either. But be advised that if the rats get smart and run either Edwards or Richardson they can and I suspect will run to the right of the NY liberal.
Also that argument of vote Rino or a rat wins is getting old quick.
Sorry, but it's true.
In the case of Rino Rudy it is not. He is just as liberal if not more so then all the rats announced. I will go third party rather then ever vote for this loser.
To each his own. Rudy will win by a good margin anyway.
I doubt that very much.
Stick around.
I will be here doing whatever I can to defeat Rino Rudy.
Perhaps not, but there is no major difference between what a Duncan Hunter would actually be able to accomplish in office and what Hillary would actually be able to accomplish in office on most major social issues, either.
We're in our seventh year of the term of the most socially conservative President we are likely to have in our lifetimes. In six of those years he was backed by a Republican House and a (sort of) Republican Senate.
I didn't notice much difference, either. ;)
Not with Duncan Whathisname, you won't!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1555762/posts
Thanks, didn't know you were having a hard time keeping up. ;)
Formatting another's comments in italics makes it much more clear.
You are right. I was being playful with my flippant response. Thanks! :)
You are right. I was being playful with my flippant response. Thanks! :)
Uh-oh, sorry.
Stay home and don't vote. That's what all fanatics end up doing. You will really show the Republicans. I hope you enjoy having your taxes increased after all Hillary always points out that people aren't paying their fair share. That is everyone but her and her Dem pals like Kennedy, Kerry, Pelosi.
I will be voting thrid party rather then vote for a liberal even if he has an r by his name.
bookmark ping-a-ling for later
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.