You can even see this reputation reflected at FR; everyone assumes that GB has some sort of capability to respond. In actuality, their naval forces are no stronger than Sweden's. They are worse than a paper tiger - they are nothing. That's why it was foolish to put their people at risk; what we're seeing is the logical conclusion.
Your implying UK does NOT have the ability to respond. Perhaps you are correct, but if this drags on like the hostage crisis under carter, what kind of message does that send?
We will probably not intercede on Britian's behalf unless we are asked, but this will only embolden Iran more if nothing is done.
Hmmm...I kept putting in "George Bush" for GB. Almost worked.