Support of an issue that's been conjured up by far-left environmentalists and refuted by science is incompatible with any domestic energy strategy.
Getting off of our dependence on foreign oil transcends whether you believe in global warming or not.
Everyone, including Rudy's friends in the Democratic Party, concludes that we need to curb our dependence on foreign oil. How will Rudy accomplish this? Since he supports global warming, that means he wants to pursue more "alternative" energies that simply aren't feasible. Of course he wants domestic energy exploration. He just wants to do it the liberal and politically-correct way.
We are too dependent on Arab and Venezuelan oil. Rudy is RIGHT ON with this one.
Rudy is wrong, as he is on all the issues except for the WOT.
The whole point is that Rudy did NOT utter the word CONSERVATION, because he knows that conservation means cutting back on the economy — he wants to provide the energy the economy needs with realistic options, such as drilling in ANWR and offshore and developing nuclear plants.
Do you disagree with this?