To: Ol' Sparky
"A strict constructionist judge can come to either conclusion about Roe against Wade Rudy is correct in his analysis. In fact Scalia has said the same thing, that Roe was a lousy decision but very well could be rationally regarded as precedent if a judge is inclined to do so.
6 posted on
04/04/2007 7:13:40 PM PDT by
zarf
(Her hair was of a dank yellow, and fell over her temples like sauerkraut......)
To: zarf
... Scalia has said the same thing, that Roe was a lousy decision but very well could be rationally regarded as precedent if a judge is inclined to do so.We need to all get behind Hillary and when elected, she can appoint judges to counteract the evil scoundrel Scalia. Who would have ever thought SCALIA agreed with Rudy on Roe v Wade. SCALIA is EVIL. Too bad SCALIA's mother was Pro-Life, etc./sarc/
To: zarf
Perhaps you should read the thread. Lots of FReepers are jumping off the Rudy bandwagon.
To: zarf
Not the same thing at all...
164 posted on
04/04/2007 9:46:12 PM PDT by
Uriah_lost
("build bridges where you can - but draw lines where you must." -Fred D Thompson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson