Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GenuineChocolateFace
“Sad reality must suck.”

Nah, sad reality is when another NW liberal comes on FR and tries to tell 90% of us conservatives here that we need to accept a liberal candidate. What’s the matter, did it get too boring over there at DU for you? People who promote liberalism in any form here on this forum can expect to be challenged and challenged fiercely. It isn’t conservatives who need to be put on the defensive here—it’s the liberals who promote liberalism.

"...100% no-compromise our-way-or-the-highway we'll sit home and let a democrat win in order to teach america a lesson' crowd as you realize that without some form of compromise and moderation, you'll continue to be irrelevent..."

You are right, no compromise--to the left that is. Moderation? Not interested. Irrelevant you say...time will tell.

I noticed in another post of yours that you don’t claim to be a Rudy supporter. Do you think you’ve got some kind of a calling to come here and defend the Rudybots? I guess someone had to go and recruit you to help protect these poor liberals who are getting their little *feelings* hurt here. How sweet of you to come and help these poor babies.

BTW, if you haven’t already, I suggest you go to the FR home page and read the FR mission. This is a very conservative forum, and as Jim Robinson has recently said, it will most likely become more conservative in the days ahead. Not gonna be too comfy for liberals...or for those who try to protect them.

And, by the way, welcome to FR.

164 posted on 04/12/2007 1:50:51 PM PDT by dmw (Conservatives do NOT vote for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: dmw
I noticed in another post of yours that you don’t claim to be a Rudy supporter. Do you think you’ve got some kind of a calling to come here and defend the Rudybots? I guess someone had to go and recruit you to help protect these poor liberals who are getting their little *feelings* hurt here. How sweet of you to come and help these poor babies. No, I'm for whomever has the strongest chance of beating Hillary/Obama/SilkyPony. I'm willing to compromise on some issues that, quite frankly, in order to get what's important to me. I guess you could say I am, for this election cycle, a one-issue voter. No different than most others here. My issue happens to be the survival of this nation. I fear what a democrat president will do to this country if they win 2008. Let's save the country first. If Guiliani represents the best chance of avoiding a disasterous democrat presidency, I'll support him. I won't agree with him on everything, certainly, but it STILL beats the alternative. If it's Thompson, even better. And even better still, someone even MORE conservative would be great. Don't see THAT happening, though.
167 posted on 04/12/2007 2:03:35 PM PDT by GenuineChocolateFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson