Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gop1040
A deferments by design was special treatment.

Once again, law clerk was not on the list of positions covered by the deferment in question.

Stop beating a dead horse and move on, unless you’re aware that there are documents out there that suggest that he never received a deferment....

You're a trip. You try to make this into a bogus document matter - and then whine and stomp your feet when it is pointed out that Rudy should not have been eligible for the deferment in question. That is well documented from long ago.

43 posted on 04/17/2007 11:39:28 AM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
You just don’t get it. It was a LEGAL deferment. It was up to the local draft board to decide whether a deferment was warranted or not. You may not like the reason for it, but that’s your problem.

READ MY LIPS, the deferment did not eliminate Rudy’s exposure to the draft, it only deferred it. Once his deferment expired, he was randomly assigned a draft number and placed back in the draft for ONE YEAR. His assigned number was never reached so he was never called up. End of story. I’ll be moving on, and I suggest you do too.

44 posted on 04/17/2007 12:14:45 PM PDT by Gop1040
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson