Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hatband; tkathy

Higher population density, less ability to secure a weapon, a frequently emotionally charged atmosphere etc. etc. etc. Not that any of this over-rides the 2nd amend. but they should be taken into account.


48 posted on 04/18/2007 4:26:09 AM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: durasell

Do you have some statistics about the occurrence of violence during academic discussion or do you just “feel” that the “emotionally charged” halls of academia are fertile ground for violent eruptions?


53 posted on 04/18/2007 4:38:01 AM PDT by Hatband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: durasell

Not that any of this over-rides the 2nd amend. but they should be taken into account.


If you’re not overriding the right to bear arms, how exactly are you “taking it into account”?


93 posted on 04/18/2007 5:49:16 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: durasell
Higher population density, less ability to secure a weapon, a frequently emotionally charged atmosphere etc. etc. etc. Not that any of this over-rides the 2nd amend. but they should be taken into account.

So you agree with the big city gun bans because of the "population density" and "emotionally charged atmosphere" of the big city?

179 posted on 04/18/2007 7:48:30 AM PDT by Texas Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson