To: Hatband; tkathy
Higher population density, less ability to secure a weapon, a frequently emotionally charged atmosphere etc. etc. etc. Not that any of this over-rides the 2nd amend. but they should be taken into account.
48 posted on
04/18/2007 4:26:09 AM PDT by
durasell
(!)
To: durasell
Do you have some statistics about the occurrence of violence during academic discussion or do you just “feel” that the “emotionally charged” halls of academia are fertile ground for violent eruptions?
53 posted on
04/18/2007 4:38:01 AM PDT by
Hatband
To: durasell
Not that any of this over-rides the 2nd amend. but they should be taken into account.
If you’re not overriding the right to bear arms, how exactly are you “taking it into account”?
93 posted on
04/18/2007 5:49:16 AM PDT by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
To: durasell
Higher population density, less ability to secure a weapon, a frequently emotionally charged atmosphere etc. etc. etc. Not that any of this over-rides the 2nd amend. but they should be taken into account. So you agree with the big city gun bans because of the "population density" and "emotionally charged atmosphere" of the big city?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson