Posted on 04/19/2007 11:04:50 AM PDT by Mia T
Your statement is ovalic.
I was referencing no threads.
And I know nothing of sh-sh deals. Whatever they are. Circular maybe?
You are welcome
You misunderstand me. I don't disrespect either the founder nor of his statement. But many Freepers don't subscribe to every facet of the statement, nor do they necessarily accept the social aspects of it as a priority for the Nation. We're not talking about respect. Those who throw the statement up continually are attempting to show that the statement is akin to one of the sacred documents of this Nation and to disagree with anything it says is to prove one does not belong here on FR. Today, one of the great Freepers of all time was banned simply for her support of a Republican candidate and for her eloquence and keen ability to articulate why we as Republicans should all come together to defeat Hillary.
That respect you refer to has manifested itself in some disgusting tactics, obscene insults, and continual threats of zotting. That is what I am comparing to DU, not the founders statement nor the respect we all have for it.
If you only knew!
I'm very clear on your concept.
Much better use of creative language, synchro.
Care for a smoke?
Sorry you didn’t recognize the sarcasm in that, but I have stopped identifying with “/sarcasm” because if I have to tell people, it ruins the effect. My condolences to those who don’t recognize it.
News flash: Rudy Giuliani has accomplished the impossible - he's made McCain palatable to me and many other freepers.
That is just how bad Rudy is. And it also shows just how pathetic your attempts to boost Rudy, attack Fred, and redefine the pro-life movement downward are.
Or should we say, were.
I hope everyone that cares sees your statement and now knows why Mia is no longer posting
That's a first, but I guess you nailed it.
“News flash: Rudy Giuliani has accomplished the impossible - he’s made McCain palatable to me and many other freepers”
And THAT ain’t easy.....lol!
Hardly.
She also managed to try to define the basic concept of pro-life downwards, and also tried to imply that Fred was in the race just to draw votes away from Rudy.
Rudy booster nonsensical attacks on Fred have become hazardous to one's posting privs on FR. Especially when they support a guy with far, far more liberal warts than Fred and have no problem with that.
Total bummer.
There have been Linux/Windows threads hundreds of times more boisterous than this thread.
As I understand it, being negative about FR on anti-FR web board sites is pretty much grounds for expulsion and I don’t disagree with that. Though I have not looked to see if Mia participates in other sites.
Hope it’s just a cooling off period.
Why don’t you post to people that can actually post back?
You might also want to open up another browser window so you can hop back and forth. The way things are going you’ll be posting to yourself in the near future. ;-)
On the lighter side, perhaps someone discovered that MiaT was really ClassyGreenEyedBlonde.
;-)
And if you help to elect hillary clinton, you must bear the responsibility for all the deaths of all the children, unborn, living, and not yet even imagined that will flow from that election.
Those are the facts. You may not like them. They may disturb your idea of 'pro-life' as viewed through the narrow lens of abortion.
So to MiaT, if someone refuses to vote for pro-abort Rudy, they are responsible for pro-abort Hillary.
As opposed to the Rudy supporters being responsible for pushing a pro-abort candidate for the nomination in a pro-life party. It's a complete cop-out on their part, so they try to blame those who are aghast at what they are trying to do for being unwilling to be complicit in such an action.
After all, every day in this country, abortion kills as many Americans as the 9-11 attacks did.
I used to smoke ovalato delicatos(not sure about the spelling.) They were a nickle a pack back in the day. As strong as Navy Cuts
Oh and thanks for the compliment.
Why don't you quit shilling for a pro-abort liberal? After all, I did show you that Rudy said abortion is a Constitutional right. Apparently, that didn't faze you.
If I only knew what? I’m a New Yorker and I was being sarcastic.
I swear, that is the reason!
It was posted on this very thread
Case closed, lets all leave.
Well if we are great, support a Republican, and are eloquent and have a keen ability to articulate why Rudy is the only alternative to Hilliary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.