LOL. I thought the freeper conventional wisdom that it was people who killed people.
Guns don’t and they are inanimate objects, so how could abstractions like “nutty gun laws” kill people?
Under the current model, once someone is committed to an institution by the courts, it becomes a matter of public record and can be picked up by the NICS system making them ineligible. How much further do we want to push the line?
No matter where the line is put, someone somewhere will be close to it, but not over, and probably still be dangerous. So how exaclty do we solve this with more laws?
The guy is right...BUT, it was the NUTTY gun law at VT (Gun Free Zone)...had there been a few can carrying students in that class, the SOB would have been dead LONG before he could kill so many.