To: shrinkermd
>>>>> ..... this seems self-serving and not an easy thing to justify.Come on. Nothing wrong with FredT keeping the books on his PAC open for some possible future use. After all, his working career was as a lawyer, actor and politician. Nothing illegal about it.
3 posted on
04/21/2007 1:39:20 PM PDT by
Reagan Man
(FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
To: Reagan Man
Yet they focus on Fred, when the Hildebeast has just about the same ratio, just larger amounts.
Another demonstration of how they FEAR THE FRED.
7 posted on
04/21/2007 1:46:20 PM PDT by
Politicalmom
(Better a democrat with an energized opposition than a leftist “Republican” with no opposition.)
To: Reagan Man
...$244,000 in "management/consulting fees" to his son's consulting firm...If he's not involved in politics, there's no need for the funds. If it's for future use, it should have been saved for future use in politics and not given to his son. It may not be illegal, but it should be. It does give a strong appearance of impropriety.
8 posted on
04/21/2007 1:49:04 PM PDT by
Rudder
To: Reagan Man; Sturm Ruger; Eric in the Ozarks
this seems self-serving and not an easy thing to justify.
I think you're missing the point. It's not a question of "illegality". The problem is the amount paid to his son's consulting firm was more than he gave to GOP candidates.
Now, I'm an FDT supporter and have been waiting for his announcement with great anticipation. I hate to see stuff like this starting to surface so soon. This is the kind of crap that Mr. and Mrs. America detest in politicians.
9 posted on
04/21/2007 1:52:28 PM PDT by
no dems
(To: Our GOP Prez, Congress of big-spenders, crooks, and pedophiles: You failed us miserably.)
To: Reagan Man
his son’s company better have some damned good records of how that money was spent ... this is a hard pig to put lipstick on.
15 posted on
04/21/2007 2:23:13 PM PDT by
EDINVA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson