Some posters don't give a crap about Giulani's record or conservatism. I think they want him because they think he is most likely to bomb, bomb, bomb Iran.
You notice there was no response. Just another drive-by liberal posting. There are no rational or principled rebuttals to the question.
This is a bit of a diversion from the ongoing carnage, but one of the ironies of the constant arguments over 'who will best fight the WOT' is that I don't recall seeing anyone consider that it might turn out to be Hillary. /grin
Hillary's goal is power, and while I don't doubt she would not hesitate to appease the Islamofascists in order to undermine her opponents long enough to gain that power, once she was in office the whole equation changes because she could never guarantee that the Islamists would abandon THEIR worldwide quest for power.
At that point, any terrorist attacks which occurred would be on HER watch, not Bush's, and although she might be able to buy a little time by blaming the deaths on Bush, that excuse would quickly wear thin.
Whether or not she really cared if her fellow American citizens were being killed (she doesn't), she would be forced to act in order to avoid losing her own power. Once she made that cold calculation, I believe she would respond far more ruthlessly than any Republican leader ever would or could.
She wouldn't hesitate to use devastating force, to level any future 'Fallujahs', or to take out any rogue nation like Syria or Iran, whether they were actually involved or merely a convenient scapegoat. The lives of the people of these countries would mean nothing to her and she would obliterate them if she calculated that would protect or enhance her power. She'd even arrest her own lunatic anti-war former supporters who were too stupid to realize that the game had changed and that, in the words of Ron Silver, "these are our planes" again.
Best of all, while she was visiting death and destruction around the globe like some modern incarnation of Kali, she would have the full support of the mainstream media and the global leftist movement, who would be touting her as the 21st Century "Saviour of her Country".
Think this sounds far-fetched? Perhaps it is, but perhaps it might also be "the Plan". These people may be evil, but they're not stupid. At their highest levels they know that the Islamist threat must be dealt with, and they may fully intend to do that, once they've assured that they'll get the credit for it.
And, in case any wannabe jihadis are monitoring this thread: "Be careful what you wish for!" /grin