Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Star Traveler
The article quoted Jessica Lynch — “Jessica Lynch, now 23, said she was giving testimony “to set the record straight”.” So, why is it — that it requires *her* to set the record straight and the U.S. Military can’t do it? If they had set it straight already — then why is she even bothering with this? Obviously something does not smell right at all, and I’m starting to look at the bottom of my shoes...

Because she's a publicity hound? Because there are a lot of people who assign undue amounts of credibility to low-ranking personnel in the military? Everyone's got an opinion. But not all opinions are equally valid. Or supported by the facts.

11 posted on 04/25/2007 12:22:11 AM PDT by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Zhang Fei

Well, that doesn’t fit the facts. If she was really a publicity hound, then “hero” fits that much better than what she’s saying. If anything she’s *lessening* her publicity, much more than if she maintained the “hero status”. So, that doesn’t fit what I see happening here, with her “setting the record straight”.

As far as her credibility, for one thing she gets a higher mark for actually *discounting* the exagerrated story. That ends up *enhancing* her credibility. Then secondly, let’s say that I’m captured and then rescued — well, then that means that the one *most qualified* to say what happened to me — is — *me*. So, I have the most authoritative account of what happened to *me*.


13 posted on 04/25/2007 12:28:31 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson