Durbin kept silent on prewar knowledge

THE WASHINGTON TIMES ^ | April 27, 2007 | Sean Lengell

[3AngelaD]

Does anyone believe this? Durbin worried about ethics? That is rich. He practically sleeps with Leaky Leahy.

[twntaipan]

Durban is vies with “Treasonous” Harry Reid for the biggest liar in the Senate.

[Brilliant]

Why’d he vote for it then?

[Chi-townChief]

What a Dick!!

[Piquaboy]

Dickless Dirtbin does not have any ethics just like his butt boy Leaky Leahy.

[2banana]

What a loser...

[outofstyle]

Why’d he vote for it then? !!!!!!!!!!!!

[Thrownatbirth]

Durbin’s gonna wish he kept mouth shut this time.

[3AngelaD]

I don’t think so. The Democrats appear to be emboldened in their treason and lies.

[dfwgator]

Dick is full of it!

Democratic Quotes on Iraq

[RC2]

So....he is now released from his vow of “secrecy”? Since when?

[DemEater]

“Why’d he vote for it then? !!!!!!!!!!!!”

I looked. Apparently he didn’t. The guy is a weasel regardless.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00237

[<1/1,000,000th%]

"I was angry about it. [But] frankly, I couldn't do much about it because, in the intelligence committee, we are sworn to secrecy...."

"Except, of course, when we decide to leak something to damage the President," Durbin added. /sarcasm

[Logical me]

Can Durbin prove this? Of course he can’t. How stupid does this nitwit think we are? Typical RAT inventions of lies and they have no shame. What a piece of c.

[Vn_survivor_67-68]

Mr. Durbin yesterday said there was no “ethical” way to notify the public of specific misleading information being touted by the Bush administration because it would have required revealing top-secret information being provided to the intelligence committee...

What a liar.....he could have revealed on the senate floor with impunity and absolutely NO risk of legal consequences.

[3AngelaD]

If you read the entire article, you see that so far no one who was privy to the committee briefings supports his claims.

[sappy]

I wonder if he stood up in applause during the SOTU address where the “information we had in the intelligence committee was not the same information being given to the American people” was supposedly being disseminated. And what does he do? Votes FOR the war.

[cardinal4]

Mr. Durbin yesterday said there was no "ethical" way to notify the public of specific misleading information being touted by the Bush administration because it would have required revealing top-secret information being provided to the intelligence committee...

If the information was wrong, wouldnt it have been ethical to report it? Ethics and Dick Durbin in the same sentence-it would make a cat laugh..

[Tarpon]

Was he lying then or is he lying now? Too bad the other members of the Intel committee didn’t lie then and freely spoke up on the record and on the Senate floor. In particular, Democrat leader Sen Rockefeller who was the only person on record to call Saddam an immediate threat in a Senate floor speech. So I assume Sen Rockefeller was lying, or just ‘playing along’.

Durbin wouldn’t know the truth if it bit him ...