Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Much Abuse Can Katie Couric Take?
Fox News ^ | Thursday, April 26, 2007 | Susan Estrich

Posted on 04/27/2007 8:50:45 AM PDT by COUNTrecount

And why is so much of it coming from other women journalists?

It's been another tough week for Katie Couric. It's never easy to be the first woman anything. The good news is that you get a lot of attention. The bad news is that a lot of this attention is likely to turn into criticism, because it comes before you're really ready for it.

So it has been with Katie. As the newscast improves, the attacks have escalated, not dissipated. CBS does a perfectly respectable evening news show, tougher and sharper since producer Rick Kaplan came on board, but you'd never know it from reading the clips.

There's Alessandra Stanley in the New York Times, reporting that Katie intentionally glammed herself down when anchoring from Blacksburg, substituting light-colored slacks and little makeup for her usual costume. So what? Does that make her a less effective anchor or reporter? Does anyone know what Brian Williams has been wearing? Would it even occur to anyone to notice?

But Stanley's piece on how everyone shined but Katie was a wet kiss compared to the hatchet job Gail Shister did on the first woman solo anchor in the Philadelphia Inquirer this week. Relying on "inside sources," Shister reported that CBS now viewed the hiring of Katie Couric to anchor the news as a major mistake, which cannot be fixed, and that they were trying to figure out when and how to get her off the anchor desk.

Shister's story got huge play, notwithstanding CBS' denial of its accuracy, and within a day, Roger Friedman, here on foxnews.com, revealed that he had information suggesting that the main sources for the Shister article were Bob Schieffer, the man Katie replaced, and Lesley Stahl, a very old friend of mine who is now with 60 Minutes.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: COUNTrecount

Not as much as she deserves!


41 posted on 04/27/2007 9:37:37 AM PDT by Hornet19 (Conservative since birth, Republican no more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Who is THIS a picture of?

RLTW


42 posted on 04/27/2007 9:38:12 AM PDT by military cop (military cop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
CBS does a perfectly respectable evening news show

Really no need to read past this point.

43 posted on 04/27/2007 9:42:01 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("We live in the era of over-reaction." - Sir Alex Ferguson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
>my wife notices that nearly every night Williams wears too much eye shadow

Maybe that's your wife
telling you she would like you
to glam up a bit!

44 posted on 04/27/2007 9:42:54 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Plus

Plus

Equals


45 posted on 04/27/2007 9:46:29 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

One thing I will say about Susan Estrich, she took for Rush Limbaugh when the corrupt Palm Beach prosecutor was trying to railroad him into prison.


46 posted on 04/27/2007 9:52:43 AM PDT by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

The “1st woman anchor” meme is absurd. I could care less if every anchor was a woman. The idea that any of us is making our decision about watching news based on the gender of the person is insulting.


47 posted on 04/27/2007 10:08:52 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Susan hot?! with a closed mouth to boot?! A Bridey Murphy moment. That must have been in your prior life.


48 posted on 04/27/2007 10:09:21 AM PDT by rod1 (uake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
But what really gets to me about the treatment of Couric is not the way the CBS suits are dealing with her, but the way her fellow women journalists are. Of all people, you'd think other women in the news business would understand just what Katie is up against and how her future is connected to ours. You'd think women would appreciate the challenge of settling into a role for which there are no role models, sitting in a chair that is usually occupied by older white men and convincing viewers to accept an attractive woman as equally credible.

It's not that women journalists should be giving her a pass because she's a woman, but that they should be the last to pile on because they understand best what she's up against. It hasn't worked that way.

I believe there is a special place in hell for women who do not support each other, particularly in our attacks on the glass ceiling. Too many women fail to understand that when one woman does make it, we all have an interest in her success, and an even bigger interest in her not failing.

This will happen to the Hildabeast as well. Women actually do not like to cheer on other women, at least of the beast variety.

49 posted on 04/27/2007 10:13:32 AM PDT by wouldntbprudent (HONK IF YOU'VE SACKED TROY SMITH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Look anyone on FR could have told CBS they were fools for hiring Katie Couric and wasteful for paying her anything. and then they followed up that clossal blunder by hiring the Bob Shrum of broadcasting....Rick Kaplan. It is simply hard to image a great succession of stupid moves beginning with Rathergate.

After the Couric disaster, Kaplan was the last person they needed. Les Moonves would have been better off hiring a real pro..maybe a Bimbo-prodigy Mr. Fix-it like Bruce Lindsey.

Better watch your cat Katie.


50 posted on 04/27/2007 10:18:58 AM PDT by rod1 (uake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Perky Katie tries so hard to be a serious journalist — by going over-the-top in criticizing conservatives, and being a shill for Hillary and Al Gore in 2000.

Anybody remember her crying on the air during the 2000 election after Florida was declared?

CBS was dumb to bring her on board — now we’ll wait ten years (with them in 3rd place week-after-week) for them to get rid of her.

51 posted on 04/27/2007 10:50:38 AM PDT by detch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson