Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9/11 was bad, but ... [PROJECTILE VOMIT WARNING!]
LA Slimes ^ | Apr. 27, 2007 | Rosa Brooks

Posted on 04/27/2007 2:04:43 PM PDT by Alouette

ARE WE A NATION of irrational wimps? Rudy Giuliani thinks so. On Tuesday, he claimed that if we elect a Democrat to the presidency, we should expect more 9/11-style attacks. This, he assumes, is enough to scare the pants off the voting public and send them scurrying frantically off to support Republicans such as … well, Rudy Giuliani.

Giuliani's line of argument — though "argument" is too generous a word — isn't new. Since 9/11, our political leaders have proceeded on the assumption that Americans are cringing, cowardly souls more than ready, when we hear the word "terrorism," to suspend our critical capacities, mortgage our futures and jettison our civil liberties and our principles — all for impossible assurances of "safety." The awful thing is, many of us obediently conformed to this condescending stereotype. The United States is the most prosperous and powerful nation in the world, but after 9/11, many of us started to act as if we're in danger of imminent extinction.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; katrina; liberal; terror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 04/27/2007 2:04:45 PM PDT by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1st-P-In-The-Pod; A_Conservative_in_Cambridge; af_vet_rr; agrace; albyjimc2; Alexander Rubin; ...
FReepMail to be added or removed from this pro-Israel/Judaic/Russian Jewry ping list.

Warning! This is a high-volume ping list.

2 posted on 04/27/2007 2:05:09 PM PDT by Alouette (Learned Mother of Zion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
ARE WE A NATION of irrational wimps? Rudy Giuliani thinks so. On Tuesday, he claimed that if we elect a Democrat to the presidency, we should expect more 9/11-style attacks.

Sounds accurate to me...
3 posted on 04/27/2007 2:14:34 PM PDT by JamesP81 (Eph 6:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

“ARE WE A NATION of irrational wimps?”

No Rosa, but you are an IGNORANT SLUT!”


4 posted on 04/27/2007 2:15:25 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods ("We're the government, and we're here to hurt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
ARE WE A NATION of irrational wimps?

No, but the author is.

5 posted on 04/27/2007 2:16:19 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

What would Liberal nitwits like this woman say if hundreds of thousands or millions of us die at the hands of Muslim Jihadists? Let’s not overreact? How much are we supposed to tolerate? If we don’t kill them, they will kill us.


6 posted on 04/27/2007 2:22:16 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY ((((Truth shall set you free))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

Rosa, dont you think a law professor ought to get her facts straight before she publishes her weekly rant?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,268541,00.html

Democrats Jump on Rudy Giuliani for Something He Didn’t Say
Wednesday, April 25, 2007

By Brit Hume

New 9/11?

Washington woke up to morning headlines that Rudy Giuliani predicted a “new 9-11” if a Democrat wins the presidency in 2008. Barack Obama responded that Giuliani has “taken the politics of fear to a new low.” John Edwards said Giuliani’s comments were “divisive and plain wrong.” And Hillary Clinton called it “political rhetoric” that would not lessen the threat of terrorism.

The problem is Giuliani never said what the headlines claimed. It all started with a story in The Politico newspaper, which contained not a single quote to support its lead and headline. But it got picked up elsewhere nonetheless.

What Giuliani actually did say is what he has been saying for weeks, that Democrats would play defense instead of offense in the War on Terror, the same approach tried back before 9/11.


7 posted on 04/27/2007 2:27:00 PM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
I think many of us do not get scared every time a politician or the Feds trot out the "think of the terrorist argument". I remember during the debate about the PATRIOT Act, some in the federal government were very much trying to scare us into supporting.

I don't scare easy, and I despise those who try to prey on the easily-scared, whether it's the federal government or Giuliani.
8 posted on 04/27/2007 2:27:39 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

I wonder if she’d change her tune if downtown LA was leveled by a 10kiloton nuclear truck bomb.


9 posted on 04/27/2007 2:33:37 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods
Ignorant indeed.

"Even Osama bin Laden couldn't have imagined that the Twin Towers would collapse, killing nearly 3,000 people."

On the contrary - the first WTC attack in 1993 was designed to collapse one tower into the other.

The bad guys knew exactly what they were doing in both attacks.

Too bad the 1993 attack drew such a tepid response from our then commander in chief.

10 posted on 04/27/2007 2:33:56 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
There hasn't been a "9-11" since 9-11-2001. Nor has there been a WTC1993, an OKC bombing, an embassy bombing, a USS Cole attack, et al.

What WILL we see when the Democrats return and what WILL the response be?

11 posted on 04/27/2007 2:35:14 PM PDT by weegee (Libs want us to learn to live with terrorism, but if a gun is used they want to rewrite the Const.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

Definitely. Now, how to communicate to AlQaida and other terrorist groups that absolutely no one will mind if they take out the LA Times, including its management, staff, editors, writers, truck drivers, janitors and anybody else involved in that mess.


12 posted on 04/27/2007 2:43:15 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Are we supposed to just sit here and let the terrorists pull off more 9/11 type attacks? Unbelievable.


13 posted on 04/27/2007 2:44:15 PM PDT by Veritas et equitas ad Votum (If the Constitution "lives and breathes", it dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

I’m happy you don’t scare easy. Hubris goes before a fall.


14 posted on 04/27/2007 2:45:26 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

read later


15 posted on 04/27/2007 2:45:55 PM PDT by nutmeg (The Democrats' "new direction" for Iraq: SURRENDER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“The bad guys knew exactly what they were doing in both attacks”

Correct, BL. Binny didn’t go to engineering school for nothing. That first attack could have killed 50,000. But Clinton was busy, don’t you know.

But not to worry, Obama said last night that if two American cities get hit when he is President, he will quickly pick up the dead.


16 posted on 04/27/2007 3:04:07 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods ("We're the government, and we're here to hurt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I’m happy you don’t scare easy. Hubris goes before a fall.

:-) Sorry, odds are you will get run down by a fellow American who's had a bit too much to drink, or Cancer or something heart-related will get you. It's very hard for me to be scared about something that's pretty far down the list of things that can kill me.

I can be scared of over-reactive governments and politicians who decide we shouldn't be as free as we are, you know, to "protect" us.

Besides, if the government were concerned about terrorists, they would have secured our southern border. They haven't, and President Bush has access to more info than you or I, so they obviously know something we don't.

If you can't trust the leadership of President Bush, who can you trust?
17 posted on 04/27/2007 3:05:15 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Rosa, dont you think a law professor ought to get her facts straight before she publishes her weekly rant?

I doubt that she does... That would be too much like having a trial before deciding on the sentence for the guilty one, a la Alice in Wonderland...

18 posted on 04/27/2007 3:19:36 PM PDT by Zeppo (We live in the Age of Stupidity. [Dennis Prager])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods
Obama said last night that if two American cities get hit when he is President, he will quickly pick up the dead.

That was an amazing reply. I guess Sen. Obama doesn't know those bodies would be radioactive; what's left of them.

19 posted on 04/27/2007 3:33:38 PM PDT by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Hmm ~ you'd have had a hard time convincing the AlQaida 9/11 ground support team of that.

They lived in this neighborhood way-back-when.

We had federal police of all sorts patroling this neighborhood, questioning people, searching, etc. for nearly a year after the attack.

We even get swept regularly for radiation.

So far, though, only one AlQaida member has been shot down here ~ just a couple of years ago on one of the children's playgrounds. Bunch of Afghans turned him in or something.

For quite some time there it was a high risk item to fly the flag in my immediate neighborhood which is why I flew mine every day, as did all the other veterans here.

Although we haven't had anything exciting happen around here since the shooting, it could happen again. Sorry you don't understand the situation.

In fact, you kind of remind me of Harry Reid ~

20 posted on 04/27/2007 3:39:57 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson