Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/homepage/x289419905

“Vandals burn flags at Natick memorial”

Photo by Ken McGagh/Daily News staff
Vandals took down and set fire to flags at a Natick memorial to veterans.
By Norman Miller/Daily News staff
GateHouse News Service
Fri May 25, 2007, 03:32 PM EDT

ARTICLE SNIPPET: “”Anytime anything like this happens, it’s disturbing,’’ said Grassey. ``What is particularly unsettling is we’re entering the weekend when our thoughts are with those who made sacrifices in this country.’’

The square is named for Dennis J. Moran, who was killed in combat in World War I, on July 18, 1918. The square includes memorials to the fallen of World War I, World War II, the Korean War and the Vietnam War.”


1,219 posted on 05/26/2007 7:22:38 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1218 | View Replies ]


To: All

Note: The following post is a quote:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1840393/posts

Congressional Panel Votes To Extend Rights To Terror Suspects
AHN ^ | May 26, 2007 11:35 a.m. EST | Christopher Rizo - AHN Staff Writer

Posted on 05/26/2007 6:39:36 PM PDT by TaxPayer2000

Washington, D.C. (AHN) - Legislation aimed at extending legal protections to terror suspects cleared a Congressional panel this week with the backing of Democrats, who worry that detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, may be denied due process.

The proposal, approved by the Senate Armed Services Committee, would, among other things, restrict the type of evidence that could be used against terror suspects. It would also narrow the legal definition of an enemy combatant and give detainees access to lawyers. That would help the approximately 380 detainees at the naval instillation.

Currently, only so-called high-value terror suspects selected for prosecution are provided legal counsel and access to the evidence used against them. Other detainees undergo reviews by a panel of military officials to assess whether they still pose a security threat.

Critics of the proposal, including Sen. Lindsey Graham, see the bill as an impediment to intelligence gatherers and other military operations.

“Any changes have to meet the test for me that they will not compromise our ability to wage war,” the South Carolina Republican told The Associated Press on Friday.

(Excerpt) Read more at allheadlinenews.com ...


1,220 posted on 05/26/2007 7:24:54 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson