Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

That explains why the NOW freepers support him, I guess.
1 posted on 05/02/2007 11:19:38 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Liz

FYI!!


2 posted on 05/02/2007 11:20:19 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Talk about the classical “kiss of death”.


3 posted on 05/02/2007 11:21:14 AM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
That explains why the NOW freepers support him, I guess.

NOW freepers? More like LATER freepers.

4 posted on 05/02/2007 11:21:17 AM PDT by dirtboy (JimRob's 12th Commandment: Thou shall not trash actual pubbies on FR to pimp false pubbies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

rut roh!


7 posted on 05/02/2007 11:22:02 AM PDT by tiredoflaundry (The greatest danger to our troops is the Congress of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

It’s because they’re such strong supporters of strict constructionist judges.


10 posted on 05/02/2007 11:23:50 AM PDT by Sloth (The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

This article is from Feb 2000 !!!!


12 posted on 05/02/2007 11:24:20 AM PDT by dartuser ("If you torture the data long enough, it will confess, even to crimes it did not commit")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Salient point is Mrs. Clinton doesn&rsqu;t have the old biddy Oprah worshipers in her corner, for not dumping Mr. Clinton, as per the Oprah Code.
13 posted on 05/02/2007 11:24:35 AM PDT by 100-Fold_Return (MY GOSH!! That's too CHEAP!!! :>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

NOW that’s a kiss of death if I’ve saw one.


14 posted on 05/02/2007 11:24:52 AM PDT by KoRn (Just Say NO ....To Liberal Republians - FRED THOMPSON FOR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Why shouldn't the NAGS endorse Rudy? He looks just like 'em.


16 posted on 05/02/2007 11:26:46 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (Warning. If your tagline is funny... I may steal it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Dulles NOW was not your mother’s National Organization for Women they were and are a renegade group.

From their website;
“the popular dissident Chapter of the National Organization for Women located in Northern Virginia.
In line with the NOW Statement of Purpose, we rebelled against the national office in 1998 when the organization sided with the White House in the Lewinsky scandals, betraying itself, the membership and all American women. Harassed by the leadership, shunned by the establishment Old Media, we still stand.
Pro-choice, we have no litmus test on abortion. Like the majority of NOW members and the American public, we believe that partial-birth abortion equals infanticide and ought to be severely restricted.”


17 posted on 05/02/2007 11:26:55 AM PDT by William Tell 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

This is 7 years old


19 posted on 05/02/2007 11:27:48 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko (A word to the wise ain't necessary -- it's the stupid ones that need the advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Is that endorsement as a man or in drag???


20 posted on 05/02/2007 11:30:05 AM PDT by texson66 ("Tyranny is yielding to the lust of the governing." - Lord Moulton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

That does it. I support anyone that is running against someone that is endorsed by NOW.


25 posted on 05/02/2007 11:49:22 AM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

..is guess NAMBLA is next—or did I miss that one?


26 posted on 05/02/2007 11:50:32 AM PDT by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

I believe the Dulles NAG was one of those chapters that did not kneel down and open their mouths during the Lewinski scandal.


28 posted on 05/02/2007 11:54:57 AM PDT by jimfree (Freep and ye shall find)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Wow, there are NOW FReepers? Who’da thunk?

I can’t believe any NOW chapter would support anyone other than their patron saint, Hillary. Very odd....


29 posted on 05/02/2007 11:58:04 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (Head Caterer for the FIRM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Nail in the coffin # 27?


31 posted on 05/02/2007 12:08:59 PM PDT by mutantcoil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Wow, talk about an endorsement that’s the kiss of death with the GOP base...Rudy would have been better off getting endorsed by CAIR.


37 posted on 05/02/2007 12:38:55 PM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

They’re just now having a press conference on the rapes?


43 posted on 05/02/2007 2:42:23 PM PDT by Bob J (nks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

now NOW, be nice...

I can just envision Duncan Hunter in the debate asking Rudy, “In 2000 you sought the support of National Organization of Women, do you seek their support NOW? And how about NARAL?”

And then whenever he lithps hith anthwer, he could say, “NOW NOW, there you go again.”


47 posted on 05/02/2007 6:48:37 PM PDT by Kevmo (Duncan Hunter just needs one Rudy G Campaign Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVBtPIrEleM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson