[GraniteStateConservative]

I forgot to add that it’s because we (and the Iraqi insurgents) are not attacking the big force— because, yes, they’d be slaughtered that way. They are merely resisting occupation.

[Ragnar54]

The “Iraqi insurgents” are not “resisting occupation”. Most of their success has been through the use of high-performance IEDs provided by Iran. A good many of the suicide bombers are probably also Iranian (a point that can never be proven, since there is nothing left of the bomber, and Baghdad CSI is not up to DNA examinations). The “insurgents” are agents of the Iranian government. The war with Iraq only lasted a few months (including the time required to round up most of the fugitives): we have been fighting Iran and Syria since. As with the Viet Cong, a prolonged “insurgency” against overwhelming force usually indicates foreign sponsorship. Americans who can’t be bothered to vote are not going to stand up against the Hildebeast and her storm troopers.