[2ndDivisionVet]

This woman (another term comes to mind) thinks that she is the President of the United States! There’s no other explanation for it! Conducting foreign policy with our enemies, contradicting President Bush at every term, giving al Queada every indication that we will surrender, etc...

[TheRobb7]

You have GOT to be kidding.

One key sentence in this article is this one:

“The courts ruled that dissident lawmakers could not sue solely to obtain outcomes they could not secure in Congress.”

If they can’t secure a “certain outcome” in Congress, ya think that might be a clue to STFU????

[DakotaRed]

So much for 3 equal branches of government.

I realize Pelosi probably shook hands with the Queen of England yesterday, but that did not elevate her to Queen herself.

Typical leftists, though. If you can’t get your way, run to a liberal court!

[mylife]

Bush last week wrote in his veto message, “This legislation is unconstitutional because it purports to direct the conduct of operations of the war in a way that infringes upon the powers vested in the presidency.”

The Presidential equivalent of a poke in the eye L0L

[TheLion]

Pelosi and company will fight this all the way to hell, caring nothing about our troops.

[tobyhill]

I wish she would try the courts then President Bush can stick it in their eyes too after their bone-headed rulings on Gitmo.

[Freee-dame]

The movie Flight 93 was on HBO tonight. Seeing it reminded me of the stakes in this war on Islamic extremism. It’s too bad that Pelosi and her lieutenants think that Pres. Bush is the enemy. If the Dems had supported their country, the war in Iraq would have been over three years ago. They do not care. Losing there is nothing to them compared to being out of political power. They are really evil.

[Rummyfan]

It’s laughable!

[keepitreal]

The upswing in reliance on signing statements during the Reagan administration coincides with the writing by Samuel A. Alito – then a staff attorney in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel – of a 1986 memorandum making the case for “interpretive signing statements” as a tool to “increase the power of the Executive to shape the law.” Alito proposed adding signing statements to a “reasonable number of bills” as a pilot project, but warned that “Congress is likely to resent the fact that the President will get in the last word on questions of interpretation.”[8]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signing_statements

[TheDon]

LOL! Yeah, the Courts want to get involved in that! I wonder if the Courts can even hear the case before it is moot.

[teletech]

What do you think the US supreme Court would do with her suit?

[capydick]

Democrats floated other ideas during yesterday’s weekly caucus meeting.

There's really only two idea's here. One is to fund the troops. The other is to pull the funding for the war and let the chips fall where they may.

But - imagine these a-holes sitting around the room trying to devise legislation which does not pull the funding but which tries to pull the funding at the same time? Utterly incomprehensible.

[thelastvirgil]

How long until 3 or 4, or 6 or 8 so-called Republicans cave to this insanity and bail on Dubya? I can imagine them lining up to stab him in the back at this very moment. The RAT insanity continues to worsen and spread.

[bikerMD]

"Hey Peloosely! I approved so many signing statements today I sprained my finger signing them. Here look."

[Paperdoll]

This loose cannon needs to be permanently de-wheeled, and tucked away in a well padded room.

[geopyg]

“We can take the president to court” if he issues a signing statement, according to Kid Oakland”

I hear he also goes by the name KOoLAID DAN.

[43north]

Is it possible that there could be more than one Anti-Christ at work in the demoncrat party?

I used to think it was Hitlery all by her lonesome. Now it seems that there is another power-mad b!tch seeking to destroy all that is right and good.

Dingy Harry doesn’t even qualify on the same level as those two loonies - he’s just essentially evil.

[DTogo]

Maybe the next “regime change” by our military should be in Washington, D.C. ...

[LibFreeOrDie]

I don’t remember the Dems getting upset over BJ Clinton issuing executive orders. As Clintonista Paul Begala said: “Stroke of the pen, law of the land. Kinda cool.”

[Earthdweller]

They are simply grasping at straws. Move on Pelosi, for the good of the country, if you can understand the concept.