[oakcon]

Tancredo, Hunter, Brownback.

Not entirely what I expected.

[Dooderbutt]

Hunter, followed by Tancredo then Brownback. My last three are: Dodd, Sharpton then coming in at the last is Kucinich (wow - big surprise there!!)

[CertainInalienableRights]

I am proud to report the Kook (Kucinich) is dead last on my list.

At the top is Hunter, and I can definitely live with that.

Wish Fred was on the scale.

[ClearCase_guy]

Hunter
Tancredo
Brownback

Oddly enough, Dennis Kucinich was at the bottom of my list! Imagine that!

[Betis70]

Huckabee, Thompson, Romney, mostly due to economics.

On just the social issues: Hunter, Tancredo, Huckabee

[KarlInOhio]

Hunter, Tancredo, Brownback

The Reverend Al was last for me.

[saganite]

Hmm. It says Duncan Hunter is my man. I wish Fred was included because that’s who I’m hoping gets the nomination.

[So Cal Rocket]

Hunter
Tancredo
McCain?????

Richardson (D) actually had the same score as Giuliani (R) (33%)

[tgusa]

Tancredo, Hunter, Brownback, Gilmore. I rate as a Hard-core Conservative. No surprise there.

[1rudeboy]

Al Sharpton over Hillary. hehe

[johnny7]

Strange that you got Brownback... I got Hunter. Guess you must be for that illegal, super-highway they got planned.

[KarlInOhio]

As a test, I left everything "no opinion" except for strongly supporting abortion. Giuliani came in third.

[Inquisitive1]

Hunter - 63%

Tancredo - 60%

Brownback - 53%

LAST TWO I'm least likely to vote for are Dowd and The Hilderbeast!

[The_Eaglet]

The survey gave Tancredo, Hunter, and Paul as my top 3 (in that order).

[cripplecreek]

I got Hunter, Tancredo and uh....McCain?

[muir_redwoods]

There is something hinky(bogus?) about this. My supposed differences with Ron Paul have mostly to do with Missile defence and China and there were no explicit questions about those topics.

I suspect there is some steering going on.

[Tax-chick]

I think this is an extremely poorly-designed survey. I did not find a choice that reflected my position on many of the issues. Not only that, but if the choices accurately described the positions of the candidates who came out first (Tancredo, Hunter), then I lose respect for them.

For example, on education, there was no choice for, “Parents should pay for their own children’s education at the institution of their choice.” On church involvement in charity, there was no choice for, “Individuals should voluntarily fund charitable works through the institutions of their choice.” On defense, the “pro-” choice was “Spend more money,” as if that were the sole criterion for determining whether a person/candidate supported national defense.

In summary, I’d hesitate to describe the person who composed this survey as a “conservative,” because the underlying assumption is that the goal is to use the Federal government to spend other people’s money the way you want.

[ncdrumr]

Hunter 83%
Tancredo 78%
Brownback 70%

Too bad Fred isn't included.

[ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY]

Among the announced candidates: Hunter, Tancredo, Huckabee.
Among the unannounced and withdrawn: Bill Frist, Then Fred Thompson and Newt Gingrich tied for second.

I’m votin’ for FRED!

[The Pack Knight]

I got Brownback, Hunter, then Tancredo as well. Interestingly, Bill Richardson is ahead of Giuliani and Tommy Thompson. I took this months ago, and had Hunter first.

This should be taken with a grain of salt, not only because of the question selections, but also because the format is weighted towards members of congress. Those who haven't held federal office tend to have incomplete "responses", with several "no opinions". You'll notice that we pretty much all had three congressmen at the top of our lists.

I've always been interested that Hunter's been near the top of mine, since there are at least 4 issues on that list where I am diametrically opposed to his position.