Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
False. The theory of evolution is based on evidence. ID is based on scripture and revelation.

Wrong, what evidence is the theory of evolution based upon?

156 posted on 05/14/2007 8:49:01 AM PDT by thiscouldbemoreconfusing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: thiscouldbemoreconfusing
The theory of evolution is based on evidence. ID is based on scripture and revelation.

Wrong, what evidence is the theory of evolution based upon?

What evidence? There are millions of pieces of evidence out there. They are grouped and explained by the theory of evolution. This theory explains the evidence to the degree that it has withstood 150 years of scientific challenges, and it allows predictions to be made. It has been so successful that, within science, there are no competing theories. That is the definition of a powerful theory.

Here is just one of those millions of data points (one of my favorites, too; I studied this skull for hours in grad school):





Fossil: Sts 5

Site: Sterkfontein Cave, South Africa (1)

Discovered By: R. Broom & J. Robinson 1947 (1)

Estimated Age of Fossil: 2.5 mya * determined by Stratigraphic, floral & faunal data (1, 4)

Species Name: Australopithecus africanus (1, 2)

Gender: Male (based on CAT scan of wisdom teeth roots) (1, 30) Female (original interpretation) (4)

Cranial Capacity: 485 cc (2, 4)

Information: No tools found in same layer (4)

Interpretation: Erect posture (based on forward facing foramen magnum) (8)

Nickname: Mrs. Ples (1)

See original source for notes:
http://www.mos.org/evolution/fossils/fossilview.php?fid=24

158 posted on 05/14/2007 8:57:54 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

To: thiscouldbemoreconfusing; Coyoteman

Coyoteman, have you read ANY of the basic books on intelligent design? Their arguments are entirely scientific and statistical, and do not make use of the Bible as a proof text.

To confuse Creationism with Intelligent Design is just plain ignorant.

Moreover, the professor in question has published 70 professional articles in scientific journals, and does not proselytize for ID in his classes. Which is certainly more than can probably be said for the Darwinists in the department.


160 posted on 05/14/2007 8:59:51 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson