Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/16/2007 9:30:48 PM PDT by curtisgardner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: curtisgardner

Hannity is a none to bright, Rudy supporting jerk!

NEXT..............


2 posted on 05/16/2007 9:32:10 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner

forget Hannity and check out the result of the Free Republic Poll , it’s right on .


4 posted on 05/16/2007 9:35:51 PM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner
Sean is having an idealogical affair with Rudy.
5 posted on 05/16/2007 9:36:09 PM PDT by elizabetty (Perpetual Candidate using campaign donations for your salary - Its a good gig if you can get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner

Is Sean supporting Rudy? If so, Sean is a liberal. And I have always liked Sean. Of course, we do not get his show in Ohio.


6 posted on 05/16/2007 9:37:47 PM PDT by Diago (What was Urban Moving Systems?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner

At least Hannity didn’t get side tracked and start talking about his fat stomach or his colonoscopy.


7 posted on 05/16/2007 9:38:32 PM PDT by Mensius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner
Oh, and I have a question. Why IS Sam Brownback even in this race?

We need him in the Senate and he belongs in the Senate. He did something stupid last year by siding with Ron Paul and the other Dems on the surge. I pray he doesn't do something stupid this year like give up his Senate seat to run for POTUS
8 posted on 05/16/2007 9:39:04 PM PDT by elizabetty (Perpetual Candidate using campaign donations for your salary - Its a good gig if you can get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner
Chuck Hagel, for instance, is a pretty darn good Senator.

Good for what?

10 posted on 05/16/2007 9:41:55 PM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner

Hannity is a Giuliani shill. Stop listening to his show and watching his “debate show” which talks way too much about Halloway, missing people, Paris Hilton and other crap.


14 posted on 05/16/2007 9:42:54 PM PDT by NapkinUser (Rudy Giuliani gets his salsa from New York City.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner
Chuck Hagel, for instance, is a pretty darn good Senator. Prior to 2002, Chuck Hagel was one of the unalloyed good guys. ... Since that time, he's deviated pretty significantly from administration position on Iraq, but has remained pretty much his same old self in all other respects.

He's the same alright. ....the same RINO as always.

15 posted on 05/16/2007 9:43:14 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner

Sean Hannity was a shill for the liberal Arnie Schwarzy and now he’s a shill for the liberal Giuliani. Hannity is against most everything that Rooty stands for. If thats the case, he can’t be considered a conservative with sound judgment and still back Rooty for president. Many other conservatives have sold out to support Rooty too. Hannity is not alone.


17 posted on 05/16/2007 9:45:37 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner

Tell brownie to drop out. Nice guy and all, just not presidential material.


18 posted on 05/16/2007 9:46:14 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner
"...we're coming to the point where all good faith disagreement about Iraq policy is being cut off.

Cut off? If Hannity won't let you babble on, try the MSM. They'll let you talk for hours.

23 posted on 05/16/2007 9:56:39 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (L'Chaim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner
did brownback ever answer Hannity’s question ?

was this a Roger Mudd-Ted kennedy “why do you want to be president ?” moment ?

26 posted on 05/16/2007 10:08:08 PM PDT by stylin19a (It's easier to get up at 6:00 AM to play golf than at 10:00 to mow the yard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner

All I know is Sean was very rude to all of his guests last night with the exception of Rudy. He interrupted all of them...and he didn’t even let Paul finish ONE sentence during the interview.


28 posted on 05/16/2007 10:11:16 PM PDT by Capitalizt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner

The article’s author forgot to mention that Sean kisses up to Rudie Julie Annie every chance he gets. I truly believe that Rudy is his man for the nomination.

I’ve really lost respect for Sean Hannity.


32 posted on 05/16/2007 10:15:59 PM PDT by no dems (Michele Malkin: She's Ann Coulter with class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner

Brownback’s views on immigration are extremely troublesome.


33 posted on 05/16/2007 10:20:20 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner; pissant
Chuck Hagel, for instance, is a pretty darn good Senator.

Sorry, I have to call pants-on-fire on that one. Unless that is what is called irony, in which case, never mind.

McCain is a guy I will never vote for, in trying to win the "maverick" label he has mostly made it a point to find common cause with the Democrats on everything that matters. The one redeeming quality he has is his support for the war that we are in and he voted for.

Chuck Hagel doesn't even have that going for him. He's an embarrassment.

In the wake of Senator Brownback's announcement that he did not personally support the troop surge in Iraq,

I don't know why everyone insist on calling it a "surge". Baghdad was in chaos and the guys in charge called for reinforcements. I can't imagine anyone, Republican or Democrat alike, denying reinforcements to troops under fire. You can't do that and expect to be taken seriously in this race as a candidate for a war-time presidency.

Do you disagree with current war-time policy? So do a lot of people. Thats how the "surge" came about; Bush's original preference was a Rumsfeldian smaller footprint, while others believed the troop levels were too small. There is room for disagreement on a lot of things. But don't ally yourself with anti-war Democrats in an effort to do, what exactly? and still expect to run for commander in chief.

I'm looking for a fire-breather, who will make the enemy sit up nights worrying when the roof is going to collapse around him. Does that sound like Brownback?

34 posted on 05/16/2007 10:20:55 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner
Brownback opposes surge, angering war backers

Brownback Comments on Troop Surge - Says more troops are not the answer

35 posted on 05/16/2007 10:21:50 PM PDT by DakotaRed (Liberals don't rattle sabers, they wave white flags)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner
Hannity is an embarrassment to "conservatism." Ask a question, interrupt before the answer is close to complete, browbeat and mischaracterize, then respond to a point that wasn't made. What a puke.

It's ambush journalism at its worst. Paul got that last night. But then again, if Hunter or Paul or Brownback get to be serious challengers, the establishment has to pull a George Wallace on them, figuratively. That was just a start.

I take it back--Hannity is an embarrassment to intellectual decency and integrity.

39 posted on 05/16/2007 10:37:37 PM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curtisgardner

Sadly, I don’t pay any attention to Hannity any longer. He’s lost any credibility with me at this point due to his constantly pumping Guliani. It appears to me he’ll compromise on any principle to make sure any clown with an “R” after their name wins an election.


44 posted on 05/16/2007 11:21:26 PM PDT by Optimill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson