Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

425 Pound Woman Judge Just Doesn't See Failure To Treat People With Dignity, Respect
ReviewJournal ^ | 28 May 2007 | Jane Ann Morrison's

Posted on 05/28/2007 8:36:10 AM PDT by Hal1950

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Hal1950; All

The error begins with having judges elected instead of appointed by the executive and confirmed by the legislature.

The law and justice have nothing to do with being popular or winning a popularity contest.

The reasons why federal judges are appointed were as sound in the late 1700s as they are today.


21 posted on 05/28/2007 8:53:28 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tioga
• She's told she should not have staff make her lunch. Answer: The bailiff wants to make her lunch.

What does he have to do, barbeque an ox?

22 posted on 05/28/2007 8:53:37 AM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus ("Eat yer groatcakes, Porgy!" "Heavy on the thirty weight, Mom!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JeeperFreeper

What happened to the masterbating judge with the sex toys in Oklahoma? That would be creepy addressing him as he did his thing.


23 posted on 05/28/2007 8:53:40 AM PDT by Eternal_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: digitalbrownshirt

I remember that one. Ole Judge Penis Pump, right?


24 posted on 05/28/2007 8:54:01 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

That’s the one.


25 posted on 05/28/2007 8:55:33 AM PDT by digitalbrownshirt (http://digitalbrownshirt.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: digitalbrownshirt

What a vile bitch.


26 posted on 05/28/2007 8:57:54 AM PDT by umgud ("When seconds count, the police are just 10 minutes away!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Joann37
Judges place great store on precedent, and the one precedent that no judge wants in his/her name is a precedent for removing a judge.

They, more than anyone else, know how slippery the law really is. What seems cut, dried and ironhard in this case might be bent into a rubber pretzel by some hotshot young legal beagle, the ramifications of which might just turn around and bite butt in a totally strange direction.

As a result, anything that can be targeted against any of the black-robed Lords and Ladies of the bench is to be treated with the utmost suspicion and distaste.

Yes, this sow is a disgrace and an embarrassment, but they would much rather wait her out and shuffle her out the door at the end of her term that establish a “precedent” that might be turned against them in the future.

27 posted on 05/28/2007 8:58:31 AM PDT by Ronin (Ut iusta esse, lex noblis severus necesse est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NaughtiusMaximus
What does he have to do, barbeque an ox?

You know the old gag about “Order in the court”? Heaven help anyone who brought her a mere ham on rye.

28 posted on 05/28/2007 8:59:21 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Popman; JeeperFreeper; EveningStar
I had a hearing in South Texas in front of a judge who talked to the lawyers and made rulings from the bench through a sock puppet on his hand. He was not re-elected.

"Do you really think a death sentence is necessary, Mr. Hand?"


29 posted on 05/28/2007 8:59:49 AM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950

What a vile pig.


30 posted on 05/28/2007 9:01:30 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950

Actually, it is a really bad example of how judges are chosen here in Nevada.

Elections for judges here are so regulated as to being “non-partisan” in their campaigning that they’re just walk-ons for an incumbent, or a shoe-in for someone with some connections to gain endorsements.

That this woman is sitting in a court is proof positive that the Clark County voters don’t know their posteriors from a warm rock.


31 posted on 05/28/2007 9:02:28 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950

32 posted on 05/28/2007 9:04:22 AM PDT by KoRn (Just Say NO ....To Liberal Republicans - FRED THOMPSON FOR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix; MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy; DocRock; King Prout; Darksheare; OSHA; martin_fierro; ...
And I thought fat people were supposed to be jolly. < /sarc>


33 posted on 05/28/2007 9:07:11 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("I AM A SEXY SHOELESS GOD OF WAR!!!" --http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0439.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950

http://www.instapunk.com/images/jabba.jpeg


34 posted on 05/28/2007 9:07:23 AM PDT by Muttering Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman

The Judicial Commission was proceeding against him, as I recollect, but the Commission acts at a speed one could describe as glacial and the election came around before the commission acted.


35 posted on 05/28/2007 9:07:23 AM PDT by JeeperFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JeeperFreeper

Let me guess they elected the sock puppet.


36 posted on 05/28/2007 9:07:52 AM PDT by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

Correction.
Let me guess. They elected the sock puppet.


37 posted on 05/28/2007 9:09:01 AM PDT by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JeeperFreeper

I can just imagine how many cases had to be re-tried because of this nut case behind the bench.


38 posted on 05/28/2007 9:17:56 AM PDT by Popman (New American Dream: Move to Mexican, cross the border, become an illegal. free everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950

Okay, let’s hurry up and call her fat and ugly.

Let’s ignore the fact that she is a lazy person taking advantage of our judicial system and our tax dollars.

Let’s ignore the fact that the people in her employ should have quit long ago — maybe even said NO to her ridiculous requests.

Let’s make sure we call her fat and ugly though.

That’s the Christian thing to do.


39 posted on 05/28/2007 9:27:52 AM PDT by agent_delta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950

Sounds like a candidate for the next democrat president to appoint to the federal bench.


40 posted on 05/28/2007 9:35:03 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson