You did praise Dr. Baden early on.
Dr. Michael Baden, a forensic pathologist who used to be New York City's chief medical examiner, said the autopsy was more thorough than most and should lay to rest all rumors of foul play.and
This doesn't close the book on the cause of this in the first place. But we know it wasn't trauma or spousal abuse. Whatever the cause, it was a natural one rather than a suspicious one."So the well-known and extremely experienced pathologist that you intially praised disagrees with you.
Michael's only alibi, and it was absurd all along, was shot down in the autopsy report.
I was under the impression that bulimia was the basis for a malpractice suit against Terri Schiavo's doctors, not that it was an alibi offered to the police as you are implying?
The problem at hand is finding a means of injuring her that is consistent with Terri's medical history.
And you claimed I was partisan and you were only searching for the truth!
That's OK, he'll change his mind again :-)
>> I was under the impression that bulimia was the basis for a malpractice suit against Terri Schiavo's doctors, not that it was an alibi offered to the police as you are implying?
Thank you for mentioning that. The malpractice suit was fraudulent. Michael knew Terri did not have bulimia and said so under oath. This is the guy you're defending -- a fraud in the malpractice suits and a fraud again in misusing Terri's trust fund. Oh, excuse me, you're not defending him, you're just interested in medical facts, and it's sheer coincidence that you back Michael 100% of the time.
Malpractice suits are a plague to the medical profession. Your guy is a serial malpractice lawsuit abuser. He had no basis for those suits, but you, a doctor, still champion his claims come hell or high water. Dr. Prawer, one of Michael's blameless victims, might wish a few words with you.
No, I didn't. But I'll bet everybody's thinking it :-)