Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Barb4Bush

I think there must be a Brit etymology to the bare naked “seen” without its “have” - lots of Brits, Aussies and Irish use it who seldom make other grammar faux pas which are that egregious.


225 posted on 05/29/2007 7:29:54 AM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]


To: Rte66; Barb4Bush
I think there must be a Brit etymology to the bare naked “seen” without its “have” - lots of Brits, Aussies and Irish use it who seldom make other grammar faux pas which are that egregious.

That makes me feel a little better. I was visiting some of my British relatives for the first time in years and another American in my party, who shall remain nameless, used "seen" instead of "saw", several times. I cringed and assumed they would see it as a low class Americanism.

I've noticed that the "I seen" usage is very common in the Northwest US.

259 posted on 05/29/2007 8:06:58 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson