Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Awfully Wicked People
Black Beauty - Chapter 34 ^ | 1877 | Anna Sewell

Posted on 05/30/2007 7:03:48 AM PDT by kinsman redeemer

"I never saw my dear master again. I believe he fell dead from the saddle. I never loved any other master so well. I went into many other engagements, but was only once wounded, and then not seriously; and when the war was over I came back again to England, as sound and strong as when I went out."

I said, "I have heard people talk about war as if it was a very fine thing."

"Ah!" said he, "I should think they never saw it. No doubt it is very fine when there is no enemy, when it is just exercise and parade and sham fight. Yes, it is very fine then; but when thousands of good brave men and horses are killed or crippled for life, it has a very different look."

"Do you know what they fought about?" said I.

"No," he said, "that is more than a horse can understand, but the enemy must have been awfully wicked people, if it was right to go all that way over the sea on purpose to kill them."

(Excerpt) Read more at readingmatters.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: terrorists; war
"...more than a horse can understand" but even a horse comprehends the reason to fight and kill an enemy.
1 posted on 05/30/2007 7:03:49 AM PDT by kinsman redeemer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer

Even a horse..... Horse sense?


2 posted on 05/30/2007 7:05:09 AM PDT by TrailofTears (."We mock loyalty and are shocked at finding traitors in our midst." CS Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer

I suspect irony on Sewell’s part.

Mrs VS


3 posted on 05/30/2007 7:07:23 AM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer

You’ve either completely missed the ironic point the author was trying to make...or you’ve taken it and are just trolling on a lazy Wednesday morning. ;)


4 posted on 05/30/2007 7:09:27 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer
"...more than a horse can understand" but even a horse comprehends the reason to fight and kill an enemy.

What's the horse's explanation for spending billions of dollars and thousands of lives rebuilding the country of a wicked people who still want us dead?
5 posted on 05/30/2007 7:11:27 AM PDT by Old_Mil (Duncan Hunter in 2008! A Veteran, A Patriot, A Reagan Republican... http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer

Anna Sewell was a Quaker.

Mrs VS


6 posted on 05/30/2007 7:12:31 AM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

The ironic point that the author, a bleeding-heart, prudish, Victorian Quaker, was trying to make...

Shirley you jest, Jeeves.


7 posted on 05/30/2007 7:35:00 AM PDT by flowerplough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Enlighten us, please.


8 posted on 05/30/2007 7:54:23 AM PDT by Postman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer

"Here I am. Find me. Find me. Kill me. Kill me. Find me, and kill me. Kill me. Find me, and kill me. Find me, and kill me. Find me, and kill meeeeeeee."

9 posted on 05/30/2007 8:05:09 AM PDT by SlowBoat407 (A living insult to islam since 1959.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor
Why do you say "irony?"

What difference does it make if Sewell was a Quaker?

To me, the plain message in the passage is this: "War is Hell. If killing is necessary, then the enemy must be 'awfully wicked.'"

That is exactly the point I was making.

Tell me, please, what message you think the author meant to convey.

BTW- I always missed the point in most of my literature classes. For example (I will always remember this exam question), "How did Lewis Carroll project himself into the character of the White Knight?" I STILL don't know. If you can tell me that also, it will relieve a burden I've carried for 35 years.

Thanks.

10 posted on 05/30/2007 5:33:32 PM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
8
11 posted on 05/30/2007 5:35:37 PM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer
"No," he said, "that is more than a horse can understand, but the enemy must have been awfully wicked people, if it was right to go all that way over the sea on purpose to kill them."

The statement is a clear example of literary irony - an example of the "tail wagging the dog". Thus, if we had to "go all the way over there" then the "wicked people" must have needed killing...but that conclusion does not follow from the "need to go over there." It's the kind of thing a stupid but endearingly loyal horse might think to himself to rationalize the action, but we more sophisticated readers are supposed to understand that "we went over there" for the glory of the British Empire or to get some new medals for the generals or some new contracts for British trading companies - and if anyone needed to be killed because they got in the way, then that's their own fault for daring to stand up to mighty Britain...so, By Jove, they must have been wicked people!

I don't know how much clearer I can make it. This isn't even subtle irony - even if you didn't know the author was a Quaker and therefore a pacifist who loathes war. It sounds like something a Bill Maher might say to mock Republicans. ;)

12 posted on 05/30/2007 5:53:49 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
My intent was only the passage as it stands and not in the context of the Crimean War, the Charge of the Light Brigade, or any of Sewell's contemporary issues.

The message stands by itself.

Captain did not know the reason for fighting. He only knew, from experience, that going to war could only be justifiable if the enemy was 'wicked.'

My point was this: Our enemy is wicked and we should not lose our resolve to kill him.

I don't think Captain was "rationalizing" the war, as you say - just explaining it as best as he could.

Sewell may have 'loathed war' but here, gives a single justification - one that even a horse can comprehend.

In the context of the Th Century and an unjustified war, it may be irony.

I find it ironic that THIS nation, at THIS time, has already lost its national resolve to fight a wicked enemy.

13 posted on 05/30/2007 7:24:03 PM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer

“Th” = “19th” oops


14 posted on 05/30/2007 7:24:58 PM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson