Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Stevens: Supporting the Immigration Bill
Audio -- Press Conference on Website ^ | 5/25/2007 | Ted Stevens

Posted on 05/30/2007 10:24:22 AM PDT by ER_in_OC,CA

IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 25, 2007 Contacts: Aaron Saunders (202) 224-1028 Steve Wackowski (202) 224-5122

Senator Stevens Discusses Alaska and National Issues at Press Conference

Audio is available by clicking here. [See transcript by Freeper ER_in_OC,CA below]

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) spoke with Washington, D.C.-based Alaska reporters about a wide variety of topics affecting the State and the nation.

Senator Stevens answered questions on the following issues during the press conference:

1. Emergency Spending Supplemental/Iraq War (4 minutes) 2. International Whaling Commission meetings (1 minute) 3. Price gouging legislation (2 minutes) 4. Tongass Land Management Plan (4 minutes) 5. Exxon Valdez settlement litigation (1 minute) 6. Steller Sea Lion Draft Revised Recovery Plan (2.5 minutes) 7. Opposition to oil and gas leasing in Bristol Bay (2 minutes) 8. FAA Reauthorization bill (6 minutes) 9. Senate’s immigration reform legislation (3 minutes)


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; illegalimmigration; immigrantlist; immigration; perfidy; sellout; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
I downloaded the audio file and have transcribed the section on immigration. Any errors in transcription are accidental.

Question: "What's your attitude about the immigration bill."

SENATOR TED STEVENS: I am supporting the substitute, which I think is really a very good one. And I want to emphasize that it is not amnesty. There is no amnesty there. If a person wants to go towards a green card, they have to leave the country and come back in under a quota.

Now, no one seems to be picking that up. All these people are talking about amnesty. Amnesty would only be in effect if someone was here and they're allowed to say here and work towards getting a green card. That is not possible under this bill.

So I do think that people should understand -- we've got two new type of visas. We used to have H-Visas, now they're going to have Y and Z Visas. And the H-2B Visa, which is one that our tourist facilities in Alaska have used will become the Y-2B, and it will be increased in terms of National use from 66,000 to 100,000 people a year. They come in for a specific purpose. They can not become eligible for any kind of green card, they can only come in for a specific job. The employer has to show that they have advertised and no one has responded to the advertisement and they have to have these people to in order to fill their jobs and conduct their business.

Its an annual thing and its limited to how many times you can have that. My memory is you can have it for 2 years, and then another two years ... (Stevens' aside: what's the final limit, does anybody remember?) It has a limit in terms of how many times you can come in as a Y-2B Visa worker.

Question: So that would deal with issues like the roe workers...

SENATOR TED SEVENS: This is important for the fishing where the Japanese buy the roe but they only buy that's been packed by their people because of the cultural way of dealing with them. It also deals with ... I was visited by some people that operate rural hotels and they're only open from May to September. They cannot afford to pay someone year-round salaries. And under the circumstances, they also don't want to be involved in paying for retirement.

These are young people. Young, college-age people mostly, and they can come in from foreign countries and work there for a summer, but there's a limit on how many times they can come in under the new Y-2B. The old H-2B there was no limit -- there's a limit to the number of visas -- but no limit on how many times you could apply for one.

I think that immigration bill is good. A lot of people...again, it's like the FAA bill, misunderstand it. They still think we're talking about the original bill. It's a long way from the original bill. It's a good bill. I really commend Sen. Kyl and Sen. Kennedy, they have put partisanship aside, they've taken time to work with people from both sides of the aisle, and I think they've got a substantial majority and will pass that bill soon after we get back.

1 posted on 05/30/2007 10:24:23 AM PDT by ER_in_OC,CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ER_in_OC,CA

He should go jump off a bridge.

You know, the one we paid for that goes nowhere.


2 posted on 05/30/2007 10:26:46 AM PDT by GovernmentIsTheProblem (Amnesty alone didn't kill the GOP - socialism did long ago. The stench you smell now is it's corpse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ER_in_OC,CA
Amnesty would only be in effect if someone was here and they're allowed to say here and work towards getting a green card. That is not possible under this bill.

Except that someone can get a Z-visa indefinitely without having to do any of that.

3 posted on 05/30/2007 10:27:57 AM PDT by dirtboy (A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem
He should go jump off a bridge. You know, the one we paid for that goes nowhere.

Finally, a pork project I can support.

4 posted on 05/30/2007 10:28:50 AM PDT by dirtboy (A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ER_in_OC,CA
amnesty am-nes-ty -n 1. a general pardon for offenses against a government Soooooo... how is it not amnesty, again? I must be one of the unanointed peasants, the hoi paloi, the great unwashed, because I just don't understand... how it isn't amnesty.
5 posted on 05/30/2007 10:29:46 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem

Didn`t that bridge die?


6 posted on 05/30/2007 10:30:00 AM PDT by neverhillorat (HILLORAT WINS, WE ALL LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ER_in_OC,CA

What part of the unnecessary $17 billion spending in the bill belongs to Ted? (rhetorical question)


7 posted on 05/30/2007 10:30:31 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ER_in_OC,CA

Amazing. He spends 90% of his time on the relatively noncontroversial temporary work visas and brushes the amnesty/Z visas with “There is no amnesty there”. Sorry, driving back across the border once a few years from now (maybe) to go from an automatically issued Z visa to a permanent resident green card instead of going back now and waiting for years for a chance to immigrate is Amnesty.


8 posted on 05/30/2007 10:30:54 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Parker v. DC: the best court decision of the year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ER_in_OC,CA
There really is no hope that this evisceration of America will ultimately be stopped. I will post a vanity about what conservatives with enough means can do to save their children and grandchildren.


9 posted on 05/30/2007 10:32:06 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("I like to legislate. I feel I've done a lot of good." Sen. Robert Byrd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverhillorat
Didn`t that bridge die?

I think the bridge died a very public death, but the money stayed in the budget for Alaska. I wonder what it could possibly be spent on?

10 posted on 05/30/2007 10:32:23 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Parker v. DC: the best court decision of the year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ER_in_OC,CA

Time to either RETIRE this RINO relic from the past or force him to become an “undocumented worker” into Mexico!!!


11 posted on 05/30/2007 10:33:49 AM PDT by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Question of the day:

Why are we giving people from other countries who want to come here legally (burearcracy), a harder time than the illegals?


12 posted on 05/30/2007 10:34:51 AM PDT by Sun (Vote for Duncan Hunter in the primaries. See you there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ER_in_OC,CA

I think it’s time we started going by our elected official’s offices. If those supporting the bill are that stupid and gullible then our country is indeed in trouble.
I wonder how many of those supporting the bill have secret Swiss Bank accounts and what groups have made contributions!


13 posted on 05/30/2007 10:36:06 AM PDT by BeckB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

“Let them eat tacos!”


14 posted on 05/30/2007 10:36:34 AM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

Ted gets a lot of pork.


15 posted on 05/30/2007 10:37:11 AM PDT by tgusa (Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem
He should go jump off a bridge.

You know, the one we paid for that goes nowhere.


He can find this bridge by using the internet tubes....
16 posted on 05/30/2007 10:38:25 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zerosix

The Mexican government wouldn’t allow it.


17 posted on 05/30/2007 10:39:04 AM PDT by seanmerc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ER_in_OC,CA
It was probably explained to him by the same person who told him about the internet. Here is what Senator Stevens had to say about the internet on 30 June 2006:

“ Ten movies streaming across that, that Internet, and what happens to your own personal Internet? I just the other day got... an Internet was sent by my staff at 10 o'clock in the morning on Friday, I got it yesterday. Why? Because it got tangled up with all these things going on the Internet commercially.

[...] They want to deliver vast amounts of information over the Internet. And again, the Internet is not something you just dump something on. It's not a big truck. It's a series of tubes. And if you don't understand those tubes can be filled and if they are filled, when you put your message in, it gets in line and it's going to be delayed by anyone that puts into that tube enormous amounts of material, enormous amounts of material."

18 posted on 05/30/2007 10:39:09 AM PDT by panzer_grey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ER_in_OC,CA
OK, how much pork is in this thing for our King of PortkTM Stevens.
19 posted on 05/30/2007 10:39:32 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Fred 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
I will post a vanity about what conservatives with enough means can do to save their children and grandchildren.

I look forward to reading it.

20 posted on 05/30/2007 10:40:48 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Fred 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson