The question I am talking about is the kick them out stuff.
Now, as to the others, say Prop. 187 in California, the courts did the kicking. Don`t like that at all, but, it`s that nasty real world again. There is a way that Congress can add certain language to some of these immigration laws, but, once again, we are going to have to give to get. And when your stuck on no compromise, you usually don`t get much either.
Given the government's record of enforcing existing immigration laws, I see no reason why we should accept the amnesty of criminals and the harassment of citizens in exchange for more promises that aren't going to be kept anyway. You seem to think we should "give", so we can "get" more empty promises. I've seen no such offer that's even remotely worth taking.
Compromise?
Shall we compromise our free elections?
Haven't you seen the results of compromise and out right corruption?
Years ago, those in California held a free election, Prop 187. It would have denied most all tax paid benefits to illegals. The Californians won this election overwhelmingly. Then the state government, working directly in concert with the Federal government burned their ballots and declared their free election illegal. This was historic and horrific.
The corporations and business owners that wanted the dirt cheap labor were funding these politicians campaigns. They wanted nothing to do with this. The dirty corrupt fix was in.
Since then what has happened? Millions fled the state only to find the same thing happening where they fled to.
Unfortunately, the results of what occurred in California can now be seen just about everywhere in America now.
The politicians like then and now, are not representing the American people. They are only representing the business and corporation owners that demand low wage labor and higher profits, regardless of consequences.
And you suggest we compromise?
I think not.