Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Myrddin

Fix him with whose money? If the medical profession has to front the cost of care and absorb the cost of pursuing the guy for payment and absorbing the inevitable loss when he either files for bankruptcy or dies, the rest of us pay for the cost of that. Individual responsibility is a great theory, but the reality is that there are large numbers of non-responsible people in the world, and they have the ability to cost YOU money. Mandates address that problem by requiring those non-responsible people to behave responsibly. The only alternatives are to either:

a.) Force the rest of us to assume the cost of their care.
or
b.) Let ‘em die if they refuse to carry insurance and can’t come up with the cash for care.

Given that, I’ll adjust to the ‘freedom limitations’ associated with a mandate in the same way I’ve adjusted to those traffic lights that limit my freedom to drive through an intersection when I want to. And I’ll make the adjustment for much the same reason.


67 posted on 06/13/2007 8:47:47 AM PDT by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: ArmstedFragg
You still left out the detail of requiring the individual to repay the cost of the care. You've opted for a socialist approach of laying the burden on taxpayers. The taxpayer is already paying for these people. I'm advocating a required repayment for the services instead of giving irresponsible people a free ride.
71 posted on 06/13/2007 11:15:09 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson